Wednesday, September 21, 2016

One Malaysian's thoughts on PM Lee's recent fainting scare


Background
Singapore's National Day Rally on 21 August 2016 was interrupted after PM Lee suffered a fainting spell about an hour into his speech, and had to be helped off-stage. He returned after resting to resume his speech. Read more here.



HOW WOULD YOUR REACT IF OUR PM FAINTED IN PUBLIC
by (Malaysian) Kee Thuan Chye
First published on Din Merican: the Malaysian DJ Blogger, 31 August 2016

I’m going to be cheeky and wonder what the reaction would be among the Malaysian public if Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak should take ill in the middle of a public function.

As you know, this happened to Singapore’s Prime Minister, Lee Hsien Loong, last week (on August 21) when he spoke at the island nation’s 51st National Day rally. He stopped in mid-speech and looked blank-faced for 10 seconds; the symptom seemed to indicate a stroke attack. He was assisted offstage for medical attention.

But after he was examined, he was pronounced to be all right. An official report said what he had suffered was merely the result of prolonged standing, heat and dehydration.

Lee returned to the hall more than an hour later to continue his speech, and appeared in good humour. He got loud cheers and a warm standing ovation and, as reported in the media, thousands of well-wishers expressed relief on social media.

The first thing he said – “I gave everybody a scare” – straight away lightened the atmosphere and brought relief to the audience who had waited patiently for more than an hour for his return. They applauded when he said, “I’m going to have a full check-up after this.”

No doubt many in the audience were ruling party supporters, loyal civil servants, fans of the PM, but you got the feeling that there was great concern for Lee when the incident occurred. Outside of the hall, Singapore social media was abuzz with messages expressing shock, wondering if Lee’s condition was serious, worrying that it might be and extending prayers for his well-being.

I got ample evidence of that from Singaporean friends I communicated with. An ex-Malaysian who took on Singaporean citizenship just two years ago said, “My wife cried when she was informed about this. We all love our PM.”

Another Singaporean friend said, “Putting country first b4 his wellbeing, hope he’s really ok… very scary.” Another lamented, “Pushing himself too hard. Sigh…”

Would this note of sympathy and admiration pour out for Najib if he suddenly took ill at a public function? It probably would from Malaysians who are unable to figure out what 1MDB implies and who MO1 is. They might be genuinely concerned, even shed a tear. But by and large, the feedback I got from posing the question among Malaysians is encapsulated in this comment, “I might be inclined to throw a party.”

Hahaha! Not very civil, is it? But hey, given the mess the country is in today because of MO1 and 1MDB, if that’s how you feel, that’s how you feel. After all, Najib himself is aware of his ‘popularity’. He admitted to an interviewee recently that he felt hurt reading comments on Facebook. “When it hurts too much, I don’t want to read them any more,” he said. And he actually laughed about it.

There is clearly a marked difference in the degree of respect for leaders among Malaysians and Singaporeans. You may say that Singaporeans have been conditioned into showing respect and admiration for their leaders through state-instituted propaganda, but I would say that Malaysians have also been similarly conditioned. In fact, in our case, there is the double whammy of feudalism which connotes that the leader is always right – and that is so ingrained in our psyche, it is harder to shake off.

I believe Singaporeans respect and admire their leaders for a real and better reason – their leaders manage their country well and there are not many signs of blatant corruption. So, even while someone like the late former PM Lee Kuan Yew (LKY) is perceived to have ruled with an iron fist and shown disregard for human rights – by, for example, killing the careers of those who stood in his way – when he died last year, more than a million people paid their last respects as his body lay in state.

Confirmed kleptocracy

I was in Singapore then and I saw the crazily long queues heading towards Parliament House to say goodbye to LKY. Some people reportedly queued for as long as eight hours!

I texted a Singaporean friend my thoughts about this phenomenon: “And what did they get to see in the end? Nothing. Not even LKY’s face. It was momentary – get there, bow and move on. And queuing up hours just for that? What’s the point?”

Her immediate reply: “I am quite offended by you.”Later, she said, “Come on! It is evident that he is well-loved, well-respected. He did his best, and more. Give credit where credit is due.”

I think that summarises the general Singaporean sentiment about LKY. My Singaporean brother-in-law wept when he bowed to the coffin of the man who helmed the island’s development from Third World backwater with no natural resources to prosperous First World state. By comparison, Malaysia, which has abundant natural resources, is struggling to become a high-income nation in 2020, and even so, despite Najib’s assurances, many of us doubt we will make it by then.

I have a sneaking suspicion that our own former Prime Minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad is hoping for that same level of reverence that LKY got when he himself passes on. That explains why he is so desperately trying to win Malaysian hearts and minds in the last year or so by saying things that the public wants to hear but which contradict his own practices while he was PM. He has even uncharacteristically apologised for curbing way back in 1994 the king’s powers in ratifying laws passed by Parliament.

I don’t know about you but I don’t buy into Mahathir’s recent ploys and stratagems – except for his attempts to make Najib accountable for the 1MDB shenanigans and the RM2.6 billion scandal. Mahathir may be concerned about his legacy but I think it is already done for. He has been singularly responsible for much of the damage he wreaked on the country’s institutions, and more. He certainly cannot say, like LKY did, “At the end of the day, what have I got? A successful Singapore. What have I given up? My life.”

While Singapore has built up a world-class education system, Malaysia is lowering passing marks for Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) subjects. Malaysia’s policies and practices have been tainted by considerations other than national development. These have spawned a crony culture that leaks public money and resources into undeserving hands. They have also created a rent-seeking culture that strains the system and dampens competitiveness. And now, with 1MDB exposed, we are also a confirmed kleptocracy.

Last Sunday, we saw a rally staged by students calling on the people to ‘Tangkap MO1’. In no uncertain terms, the protesters referred to MO1 by name as Najib Razak, the Malaysian official who was revealed by the United States Department of Justice as the alleged recipient of billions of ringgit siphoned illegally from 1MDB. That’s how much ‘respect’ we have for our PM.

So, I guess I’m not being cheeky after all. But don’t get me wrong. I’m not wishing that Najib will take ill in public – not at all – but if it does happen, I wouldn’t be surprised if the partying mood ran high.

KEE THUAN CHYE is the author of the bestsellers ‘Unbelievably Stupid!’ and ‘Unbelievably Stupid Too!’
https://www.malaysiakini.com/columns/354037#ixzz4IrcaBqBI




[Defending the Lion City] S’pore must stay strong psychologically in face of crisis: Ng Eng Hen




BY ILIYAS JUANDA
TODAY, PUBLISHED: 10:45 PM, AUGUST 26, 2016

SINGAPORE — With the threat of a terror attack looming over the nation, the Home Team and Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) are doing their best to keep Singapore safe, but society has a role to play in staying mentally resilient in the event of a national crisis, said Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen on Friday (Aug 26).

Should an attack happen, Singaporeans must continue to go out — to shops, cinemas, work — and keep the country going, said Dr Ng, as he launched the NS Mark accreditation scheme at the Total Defence Awards gala dinner at Pan Pacific Hotel.

If people allow their fears to overwhelm them in the event of a national crisis, and shirk away from activity, the impact will be worse than the crisis itself, said Dr Ng, citing the bombings in Brussels in March this year, where 32 people died. Occupancy at some hotels in the Belgian capital dropped from 82 to 25 per cent overnight, in the aftermath of the attacks.

In his speech, Dr Ng also pointed to recent events such as the arrests of members of a terror cell in Batam, who were plotting to fire rockets at Singapore’s Marina Bay. He noted that the fight against terrorism cannot be left to the Home Team and SAF alone.

During a crisis, society has to play its part in psychological defence by going to public places, and economic defence by not giving up so that jobs and businesses can keep going.

“Because at the heart of the message of total defence was a simple one — that the unity of Singaporeans is our key strength,” said Dr Ng.




Addressing the audience, which included employers being recognised for being supportive of National Service, he added: “When you support your NSmen in your company or provide civil resources during mobilisation, you are directly contributing to Singapore’s security.”

The Total Defence Awards, first introduced in 1986, recognise businesses and organisations for their contribution to Total Defence. The NS Advocate Award is given to four different groups — small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), large companies, organisations and individuals.







The new NS Mark accreditation scheme is aimed at encouraging employers and businesses to step up support for their NSmen employees.

“Our founding generation fought against communism, Konfrontasi and racial riots. Our generation today now faces the threat of terrorism. And whether this generation can overcome the current challenge and future ones depends on total defence, depends on people like you who strengthen our defences,” said Dr Ng, who handed the NS Advocate Award to 28 organisations.

Dr Maliki Osman, Senior Minister of State for Defence and Foreign Affairs, presented the awards to 52 SMEs and 34 large companies, while Senior Minister of State for Home Affairs Desmond Lee presented the award to 12 individuals.

Article Source: Today



[Defending the Lion City] Exercise Heartbeat 2016 - Simulated terror attack at Esplanade



EXERCISE HEARTBEAT 2016
On 2 Sep 2016 at 8.30am, the Police and SCDF conducted an exercise codenamed “Exercise Heartbeat” at the Esplanade­-Theatres on the Bay.

The exercise involved the Esplanade staffs and tenants, members of the Safety and Security Watch Group, as well as residents and students within the vicinity. 

As a lead up to this exercise, they underwent training to equip themselves with SGSecure knowledge and skills, including ‘Run, Hide, Tell’ and Improvised First Aid Skills (IFAS). 

This exercise was an opportunity for the community stakeholders to apply their newly acquired SGSecure skills in a simulated terror attack exercise.


The threat of terror attacks in Singapore is at its highest in recent times. Exercise Heartbeat 2016 serves to enhance the emergency preparedness and resilience of the business community, so that they can better respond and cope in an actual terror attack.

Source: Singapore Police Force FB page



Simulated terror attack at Esplanade for Exercise Heartbeat 2016

By Loh Chuan Junn and Calvin Oh, Channel News Asia, Posted 02 Sep 2016 09:41


SINGAPORE: An explosion was heard and gun shots fired at Esplanade - Theatres on the Bay on Friday (Sep 2) as part of an anti-terror exercise, codenamed "Exercise Heartbeat".

Exercise Heartbeat was organised with the aim of enhancing emergency preparedness and joint response during a crisis. This was the eighth time the exercise has been held and this year's edition involved 167 people.

The recent attack at Bataclan Concert Hall in Paris made it all the more important for such exercises to be held, said Mr Amrin Amin, Parliamentary Secretary for the Ministry of Home Affairs, who observed the exercise.

"Recently we have seen the attack of the concert hall at Paris so this is not child's play. It's real and we have to prepare ourselves and know what to do in the event of an attack," siad Mr Amrin.

"An exercise like this is very useful so we sensitise as well as practise our standard operating procedures. So when the time comes all of us are able to respond decisively," he added.

The exercise began with a simulated Improvised Explosion Device (IED) explosion during a concert held at the upper concourse of the Esplanade. As the public evacuated, gunmen started shooting, forcing them back in the building.

The Emergency Response Team from the Singapore Police Force (SPF) then joined the exercise by responding, engaging and neutralising attackers to minimise casualties.

Following which, Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) officers then responded to emergency calls to assist in the situation.

The exercise involved the Esplanade staff, members from the Safety and Security Watch Group (SSWG) and students and residents from the neighbouring buildings.

In total, the exercise lasted about 20 minutes.

Prior to this exercise, SPF and SCDF conducted SGSecure training sessions to equip Esplanade staff, tenants and other community partners on survival skills and knowledge.

In a release on Thursday, SPF said members of the public are "advised not to be alarmed by the loud sounds and exercise activities", and that “blanks, thunder flashes and fire and smoke simulators will be used during the exercise"

Signs indicating “Exercise-In-Progress” will be displayed and cordons will be set up within the exercise venue.

“Exercise Heartbeat will help our business community prepare for terrorist attack scenarios,” the police said, adding that members of the public may call the police hotline at 1800-255-0000 if they have further queries.

- CNA/am

Source: Channel News Asia






Brookings Institute: Housing, inclusion, and social equity: A global perspective:




Housing, inclusion, and social equity: A global perspective

  • Keynote address by DPM Tharman Shanmugaratnam (from 23:18 min)

Many nations face the challenge of promoting social inclusion and economic opportunity. Patterns of housing development impact the distribution of life chances and prospects for greater social equity. Are there lessons from around the world for public policy that can be learned from each other? Which countries have put in place policies that are improving mobility? What can be done better?

On November 30, the Center on Children and Families at Brookings, Washington University in St. Louis, Duke University, and the National University of Singapore hosted an event featuring a keynote address from the deputy prime minister of Singapore, and contributions from scholars and policymakers from the U.S., Singapore, the United Kingdom, and India.
Download the uncorrected Transcript here (DPM Tharman, from page 11)

See the event website here



[Defending the Lion City] Singapore military exercise fires up regional economy in central Queensland

Photo: The Singapore Armed Forces have brought in tanks for Exercise Wallaby. (Flickr: Cyberpioneer)



Singapore military exercise fires up regional economy in central Queensland
ABC Capricornia By Paul Robinson Posted Mon 19 Sep 2016 at 12:13pm

An influx of 6,000 soldiers from Singapore is expected to inject millions of dollars into Queensland's economy over the next two months.

The Singapore Armed Forces have been conducting Exercise Wallaby at Shoalwater Bay near Rockhampton every year for more than 20 years.

This year's exercise started at the weekend.

Capricorn Enterprise chief executive Mary Carroll said the exercise generated much-needed revenue for local businesses.

"Transport and logistics, suppliers, whether it be linen services through to food obviously," she said.

"Services on the ground, then you've got the infrastructure, suppliers or contractors who assist in the construction and the upgrade of roads and facilities up there.

"The Singapore Armed Forces' impact to the region in economic terms is about $35 million a year.

"That's not just the logistics and all the components of their training, but also their … rest and relaxation program as well."

Ms Carroll said the soldiers also enjoyed retail therapy after they finished their military duties.

"They love shopping, they love air conditioning, and a number of the shops do very well during their visit here," she said.

"We've had many years in the region, a great relationship with Singapore Armed Forces, and we certainly value not just the economic input but their friendship.

"Over the years on very special occasions, their military bands have come over and performed for our local communities, and the cultural respect between the two nations I think is very commendable."

Read the rest of the article here






Friday, September 16, 2016

[Defending the Lion City] SAF sets up high readiness unit in the face of new threats: Dr Ng




Minister for Defence Dr Ng Eng Hen: SAF sets up high readiness unit in the face of new threats
Report by Teo Jing Ting, Posted: 30 Jun 2016, Source article:  MINDEF

With an increasingly uncertain security environment and the rise of transnational challenges such as terrorism, the Ministry of Defence (MINDEF) and the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) are stepping up their efforts in the areas of force readiness as well as defence capabilities and technologies.

This was the point that Minister for Defence Dr Ng Eng Hen brought across during a media interview on 28 Jun, ahead of SAF Day on 1 Jul.

Restructured and ready to meet new challenges

Highlighting that no country is immune to the effects of home-grown terrorism, Dr Ng said that even if the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) was weakened in Iraq and Syria, it could lead to the return of thousands who had left ASEAN countries to join the terror group. This is a problem that is likely to plague countries in the next two decades.

In response, the SAF has set up the Army Deployment Force (ADF) - a high readiness force that will sharpen the SAF's ability to respond to terrorism and other challenges. 


The Army Deployment Force (ADF) will be a battalion-sized force comprising highly-trained soldiers with niche capabilities to reinforce the operations of the Island Defence Task Force (IDTF), Special Operations Task Force (SOTF) and Home Team agencies in an expanded range of tasks.
PIC: MINDEF


"The basic task for the ADF is (to act as a) rapid response element, as speed is important in counter-terrorism... It's a battalion-sized force and will comprise highly-trained soldiers with niche capabilities and (the ability) to respond to terrorist threats in an urban setting," said Dr Ng. 

The ADF will be working with the Island Defence Task Force (IDTF), Special Operations Task Force (SOTF) and Home Team agencies, in an expanded range of tasks.

For instance, if multiple attacks occur in Singapore, the SOTF and ADF will be activated to support the Home Team. In this scenario, the ADF can be employed with assault weapons and the Peacekeeper Protected Response Vehicles to surround an affected area and contain the armed attackers, while the SOTF closes in to neutralise them and rescue hostages.

Other areas in which the ADF could be activated include civil contingencies, regional Humanitarian Assistance and Disaster Relief missions and Peace Support Operations.

Greater international cooperation

Working with other countries for information-sharing and to build trust is also crucial in guarding against terror attacks, said Dr Ng.

He cited the example of the proposed joint patrols between Indonesia, Malaysia and the Philippines in the Sulu Sea. Singapore will be joining the patrols, and Dr Ng said he had also offered the Republic of Singapore Navy's (RSN's) Information Fusion Centre (IFC) as a resource for the Sulu Sea patrols. The IFC is a regional maritime security information-sharing centre with linkages to more than 60 agencies in over 30 countries.

Dr Ng also announced that Singapore would be facilitating some proposals raised by Chinese Minister of National Defence General Chang Wanquan at the recent ASEAN-China Defence Minister's Informal Meeting. These include enhancing counter-terrorism cooperation, having more exchanges and holding a maritime exercise between ASEAN and the Chinese military.

In light of the recent South China Sea disputes, Dr Ng added that the more ASEAN engaged with China, the better for all.

New military platforms


To boost the SAF's capabilities, a new Armoured Fighting Vehicle (AFV) will be replacing the ULTRA M113 AFV, which has been in service since the early 70s. The new platform will provide the SAF's armoured forces with enhanced firepower, protection, mobility and situational awareness.


The new Armoured Fighting Vehicle (AFV) which will be replacing the ULTRA M113 AFV.
PIC: MINDEF


Developed by the Defence Science and Technology Agency (DSTA) and local defence industry, this next generation AFV is equipped with systems not found in its predecessor, such as a laser rangefinder and automated firing control systems.

Those operating the next generation AFV will also enjoy greater ease of communication with their fellow soldiers.

Major (MAJ) Chee Hong Yi, a staff officer involved in the next generation AFV project, explained that the new vehicle is equipped with networked communication systems, allowing operators to communicate with one another through voice and data. A dismounted soldier from the M113, on the other hand, has to rely on hand signals to communicate with his counterparts in the vehicle.

Previously a company commander for a unit operating the M113, MAJ Chee spoke about how he had to bear the brunt of high wind chill during overseas exercises as the commander is positioned at the open hatch of the vehicle.

"(The closed-hatch design of the new AFV) will allow the commander to operate in a controlled environment (and no longer be exposed) to external elements," said MAJ Chee.

The SAF will also see the addition of a new platform - the Protected Combat Support Vehicle (PCSV).



Called the Protected Combat Support Vehicle (PCSV), the new vehicles will provide our motorised infantry combat support and combat service support forces with improved firepower, protection and situational awareness to enhance their survivability. The PCSV will be commissioned by 2017.
PIC: MINDEF


This suite of vehicles will provide improved firepower, protection and situational awareness for motorised infantry combat support and combat service support forces.

Military Expert (ME) 3 Gunasekaran, an assistant engineer from 9th Singapore Division/Headquarters Infantry, noted that the PCSV is versatile as it can carry a payload of up to 4,000kg for different operational needs. It also has a mounted remote-controlled weapon system.

"The body of the vehicle is armoured and can withstand small arms or landmines. We (also) have enhanced networking through the battlefield management system, which allows rapid information exchange on the battlefield," explained the 39-year-old.

Both the PCSV and the locally-developed AFV will be rolled out by 2017 and 2019 respectively.

More automated systems

For the Republic of Singapore Air Force (RSAF), its Super Pumas will be replaced with new helicopters, while the CH-47 Chinook helicopters will have a new variant.

Paya Lebar Air Base (PLAB) will also be relocated by 2030. Beyond the expansion of Changi and Tengah Air Base, the relocation will allow the SAF to build a modern, "smart" airbase from scratch, said Dr Ng. Greater automation and unmanned systems could be used in areas such as security and in the launch and recovery of aircraft.

"There are opportunities to design from inception so that the end result is a smart, 21st-century military airbase that is…more protected (and) has greater (airpower) projecting capabilities," said Dr Ng.

He added that there were also plans for an Enhanced Island Air Defence System to provide a comprehensive shield that protects Singapore against airborne threats.

Noting the good progress in the Republic of Singapore Navy's (RSN's) Littoral Mission Vessel (LMV) programme, Dr Ng revealed that a third LMV, Unity, will be launched later this year. So far, two LMVs - Independence and Sovereignty - have been launched. All eight LMVs are expected to be operational by 2020.

Other future additions in the RSN include two new Type 218SG submarines, which are slated to arrive post-2020, and replacements for the Landing Ships Tank. In line with the move towards greater automation, the RSN is planning for a fully unmanned fleet to replace its Mine-Counter Measure Vessels.

Stronger defence technology community

A national security centre will be set up by DSTA to coordinate counter-terrorism efforts, using data analytics and Command and Control systems, said Dr Ng. This will help to integrate responses by MINDEF and the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) so that the SAF and Home Team can work more closely to combat terrorism.

He added that MINDEF will have a Cyber Security Operations Centre 2.0, containing advanced content scanning engines, data analytics and security assessment tools that will allow them to investigate and recover from possible cyber attacks.

To meet the greater need for defence technology, MINDEF will be launching a scholarship to attract the best minds in science and engineering to lead DSO National Laboratories and DSTA.

Dr Ng said: "(The MINDEF Defence Science Scholarship) will be for a selected few, but there will be a great responsibility, (the same) as we put on the SAF scholars who rise to become leaders."

Enhanced training opportunities

With the recent signing of the Australia-Singapore Comprehensive Strategic Partnership (CSP) in May, the SAF will be able to tap on the vast Australian land space - 10 times the size of Singapore - for training over 25 years.

Noting that this was a good training opportunity for national servicemen, Dr Ng said that that the SAF's training plans there include a combined arms live-firing range for the artillery, the armoured infantry and the RSAF's Apache helicopters, as well as an urban live-firing area much bigger than the Murai Urban Live-Firing Facility in Singapore.

Dr Ng also gave updates on the Committee to Strengthen National Service (NS) recommendations such as the NS Vocation Matching initiative and the NS Mark.

The former will allow pre-enlistees who are enlisting next year to indicate their interest for vocations across the SAF, Singapore Police Force and the Singapore Civil Defence Force.

Dr Ng noted that the organisations would try to better match the aptitude of NSFs with vocations of their interest, but emphasised that operational requirements came first.

The NS Mark accreditation scheme will seek to recognise more pro-NS employers through two tiers - NS Mark and NS Mark (Gold) - as a form of appreciation for their support. It will be launched in August.

Moving forward
While the SAF has done well in the last 50 years, Dr Ng assured that it would continue to vigorously and robustly defend Singapore, build friendships with other countries, and protect Singapore's interests.

All this, however, would not be possible without the support of Singaporeans, he added.

"What I've shared are measures to continually improve the SAF as our predecessors have done, so that we are always prepared and ready to meet today's challenges, as well as adapt to new challenges on the horizons, even unseen ones," said Dr Ng.


"We have to continually to do this: invest in resources (and) call upon Singaporeans to do their NS duties so that the SAF can protect Singaporeans and defend our nation."


Source article:  MINDEF


Read more here:








One Singaporean's view



Fireworks during the National Day Parade preview on July 23, 2016. ST PHOTO: KEVIN LIM


By Ganesh Sundram (via FB post), 16 Sept 2015

So.... my country has one neighbour thats always having "forest fires" at only one particular time... every year.... without fail.... causing a huge smog issue.... every year.... without fail.... and when my country offers help... that neighbour refuses.... it also blames my country abt the smog... saying that the smog is caused by companies owned by singaporeans burning stuff... in their land....not only that... that same neighbour is now complaining about airspace that my country is using... saying that it wants to take that airspace back....




Then... my country has another neighbour... whose leader jus anaconda swallowed a heap load of money.... and now... there is a protest going on in the capital of that country.... to a point where riot police have been engaged....




My country is an island... set in the centre of these two juggernauts.... and it doesnt have issues like this.... it is also so small that if u zoom out on the world map... so that u can see the entire size of my two neighbours.. you cannot see my country..... my country also jus held its elections.... and after that... i could still go out freely... work... shashay around and come home like nothing happened.........

You know whats the strange part??? My two neighbours... if i walked up to any of their citizens and scorned at their countries.... i would probably get slapped and slashed..... they have this undying love and patriotism towards their countries... its not funny...

But here... in my own country.... where i am protected... fed... educated... sheltered and given a standard that compares to the world's superpower..... i have fellow countrymen and women who scorn and scoff at my country....

I have my own countrymen and women questioning my government's intergrity....









My dad always said...

"you can wake someone who is sleeping... but you cannot wake someone who is pretending to sleep"

Thank you singapore... thank you... my government.

Thank you very much.

Pics inserted by DTCL.


Thursday, September 15, 2016

How Johor’s growing water woes could affect Singapore


Water pipes at Johor Causeway. These pipes feed raw water to Singapore under the Singapore-Malaysia Water Agreements. Pic: ST PHOTO


How Johor’s growing water woes could affect Singapore

By Jackson Ewing and Karissa Domondon
Published: September 15, 2016. TODAY Online


Since its founding, Singapore has depended on water imports from neighbouring catchments in Johor, Malaysia, through agreements reached in 1961 and 1962.





Over time, Singapore improved its domestic catchment management, created more efficient water-use systems, and brought desalination capacity online. Meanwhile, Johor has transformed itself into a bustling hub second in many ways only to Malaysia’s capital region. These developments have created a new water calculus between Singapore and Malaysia.

Since early 2015, drought, pollution and large discharges to combat salinity have depleted water levels in Johor River dams to historic lows, forcing Johor to seek additional potable water supplies from Singapore on three occasions in 2015 and 2016 and to impose water rations for 
85,000 residents and industrial users in April this year .

This shock to the system is spurring a re-evaluation of cross-border water relations, and reveals Johor’s vulnerability to the resource impacts of its own development and the changing climate.

The status quo ties directly to the initial treaties. The 1961 agreement gave Singapore drawing rights of up to 391 million litres per day (mld) until 2011 from the Tebrau and Skudai Rivers in Johor. The 1962 agreement allows Singapore to draw up to 1,136mld from the Johor River until 2060 through the Linggiu Reservoir and the Johor River Water Works (JRWW).

Singapore is to pay RM0.03 (S$0.01) for every 1,000 gallons of water supplied under the two agreements.





The Linggiu Reservoir and the JRWW are located near Kota Tinggi in eastern Johor and are managed by Singapore’s Public Utilities Board (PUB). The reservoir was created by building a dam across a tributary of the Johor River, as agreed under a supplementary agreement signed in 1990, and has been in operation since January 1995. Raw water drawn from the reservoir is channelled to the three water treatment plants that make up the JRWW.

Together, these plants provide a total output of 1,136mld of water, as stipulated under the 1962 agreement, and the treated water is then supplied to Singapore via pipelines.

Despite this long-standing functional cooperation, water has been at times a major irritant in relations between the two countries, with Malaysia arguing that the treaties favour Singapore. Malaysia has made veiled threats that it might cut off the supply of water or repudiate the water agreements when relations became strained along other fronts.

This caused Singapore to become increasingly concerned about its water supply, and influenced the island-state’s security and foreign policy strategies for decades.

One response that began in earnest during the 1970s was Singapore’s multipronged effort towards water diversification. The country invested significantly in technologies and systems for converting wastewater and seawater into useable forms and improving catchment storage. The results are striking: Treated wastewater (NEWater) now accounts for 30 per cent of Singapore’s total freshwater needs and desalinated water 10 per cent; and Singapore’s water catchment area has increased to two-thirds of the country’s land surface, from 11 per cent in 1970.

Each of these domestic sources continues to grow, and as a result, Singapore has been able to reduce its reliance on Malaysian imports.

Today, roughly 40 per cent of Singapore’s water needs are met by water from Malaysia, compared with 80 per cent at independence in 1965.

Significantly, when the 1961 agreement expired on August 31, 2011, Singapore decided against its renewal and handed over two water treatment plants in Skudai and Gunung Pulai and two water pumps in Tebrau and Pontian to Johor. Singapore has set a target for water self-sufficiency by 2061 — not farfetched, given the pace of technological innovations.

Until then, it will continue to depend on Johor for water.

JOHOR’S GROWING WATER STRESS

As with much of Malaysia, Johor has historically been water-abundant and receives an average annual rainfall of 1,778mm per year. However, water usage in the state is expanding substantially and, when coinciding with drought, has led to serious shortages. Johor is Malaysia’s second-most- populous state after Selangor, with a population of 3.55 million in 2015, and is becoming an international industrial hub.

The state has traditionally been a major producer of agricultural commodities, including palm oil — where it has the highest growth rate in Peninsula Malaysia — as well as rubber, pineapples, coconuts, cocoa and coffee. This agricultural base is being outstripped by growth alongside its border with Singapore.

The Iskandar Development Region (now named Iskandar Malaysia) was launched in Johor in November 2006 as a special zone covering 2,217 sq km, roughly three times the size of Singapore. The zone focuses on the industrial and service sectors, and seeks to capitalise on its synergies with Singapore to create an integrated economic hub. Between 2006 and 2013, it registered cumulative committed investments totalling RM111.37 billion, of which 40.2 per cent has been realised.

Johor’s population is projected to grow to as much as five million in 2030, doubling water demand. This, along with pollution, is expected to strain Johor’s export commitments to Singapore. Discharge from sewage treatment plants, agro-based factories, livestock farming, estate agriculture and domestic sewage all affect the waters of Johor.

In 2008, 14 out of 21 rivers in the Iskandar Malaysia zone had moderate pollution levels while five rivers in the Tebrau catchment exhibited more serious pollution. One river in the Pasir Gudang catchment experienced severe pollution caused by industrial and development activities.

As pollution has worsened, the cost of water treatment has gone up, and industrial and transportation growth in bustling southern Johor are further exacerbating these threats. The results of dry-season water stresses are becoming progressively apparent.

Malaysia receives the bulk of its rainfall between December and March, and 97 per cent of the country’s needs are met by rain-fed surface water. Johor is no exception and in 2010, more than 500,000 people in the districts of Batu Pahat and Kluang were allowed a supply of water for only 12 hours a day, or 24 hours of alternating water supply. The state government also undertook cloud seeding in an effort to increase water levels, to little avail.

The dry conditions of 2015-2016 have revealed still greater threats to Johor’s water sources.

In August and September 2015, Singapore agreed to transfer 22mld to Johor Bakaj (the Johor Water Regulating Body) following low water levels at the Sungai Layang Dam and the Linggui Reservoir.

The Linggiu Reservoir, which has the capacity to supply half of Singapore’s daily demand, was just 31 per cent full by mid-2016, compared with 80 per cent at the start of the year. Singapore’s Minister of Environment and Water Resources Masagos Zulkifli confirmed that the Republic has asked Malaysian water authorities to top up the reservoir.

In June and July alone, Johor Bakaj twice requested additional supplies of water from PUB Singapore, citing supply system shutdowns due to pollution in the Johor River.

The June 4, 2016 request, involving the supply of six million gallons (22.7 million litres) per day for a month, above and beyond the nearly 60mld of treated water that is supplied by Singapore to Johor per day, was due to low water levels from dry weather at Johor’s Sungai Layang dam. In July 2016, Johor Bakaj made an urgent request for an additional supply of 22mld of treated water, this time citing a shutdown of their supply system in Johor Baru due to pollution in the Johor River.

POLITICS, PRICING, AND USAGE

The lack of consumer water efficiency and conservation in Malaysia further complicates matters. Malaysia has the highest per capita water usage in South-east Asia, with a daily water consumption of 280 litres, compared with 155 litres in Singapore, 175 litres in the Philippines and 130 litres in Indonesia.

A key reason is that water in Malaysia is relatively cheap. It is typically not more than 5 per cent of disposable household income and much lower than electricity costs. Johor, however, has among the highest water tariffs among Malaysian states and is unlikely to increase domestic water prices. The state may, in fact, implement targeted water subsidies.

The ruling Barisan Nasional, for example, promised free water to those families who are registered with the MyKasih programme during the 2013 election. The Parti Keadilan Rakyat (People’s Justice Party), meanwhile, has attacked the Johor government for the water shortages that have forced the state to seek additional supply from Singapore.

Singapore, likewise, appears not to be on the path towards pricing in more efficient water use. Its current target to reduce per capita consumption to 147 litres by 2020 and 140 litres by 2030 has been criticised as too modest for a country dependent on significant water imports. While in many swathes of the developed world water prices are increasing to promote its sustainable use, in Singapore 2015 prices were 25.5 per cent lower in real terms, compared with 2000.

Malaysian leaders have long argued that the 1961 and 1962 water agreements priced water at a level that is “too low and unrealistic”. Singapore has typically cited the two water agreements and the Separation Agreement of August 7, 1965 and reasoned that “international law and the sanctity of treaties voluntarily entered into by governments are the foundation of inter-state relations” and must be adhered to.

Singapore has not always opposed an increase in the price of water outright. For instance, during talks between then-Senior Minister Lee Kuan Yew and then-Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad in September 2001, Singapore made a counter-offer of RM0.45 per 1,000 gallons of water to Malaysia’s proposed RM0.60.

Malaysia and Singapore could ultimately not agree on a fair price or the appropriate methodology for discovering one, and, as a result, the 1960-1961 prices have remained.

{ Read more about the Water Agreements here: Minstry of Foreign Affairs, Singapore - Water }

Recent scarcities in Johor call into question whether the water relationship can remain on an even keel into the coming years and decades. Johor State Public Works, Rural and Regional Development committee chairman Hasni Mohammad has said that Johor will honour its 1962 agreement with Singapore, although “the selling price does not make sense, given the current environment”, adding that “several quarters” have urged the state government to stop supplying water to Singapore due to the current water shortage.

THE FUTURE OF CROSS-STRAIT WATER RELATIONS

Despite these problems, there does appear to be bilateral support for making the Singapore-Malaysia water relationship work. Most notably, a February 2013 agreement between Prime Ministers Lee Hsien Loong and Najib Razak to honour the terms of the 1962 water agreement and implement the “necessary measures to ensure reliable water supply from the Johor River” bodes well for the future of cross-strait water trade.

Both Malaysia and Singapore have also flagged large-scale capital investments into their water systems to improve efficiency and expand treatment and desalination capacity. Malaysia announced that RM13 billion worth of investment in water distribution systems is required to reduce the share of non-revenue water to 25 per cent by 2020, while Johor has asked for an allocation of RM660 million under the 11th Malaysia Plan to build a new dam at Sungai Ulu Sedili.

The Singapore PUB has called a tender for the construction of a fourth desalination plant, anticipated to be completed by 2019, that will add 30 million gallons of water a day to Singapore’s water supply.

But current realities in Johor may overwhelm Singapore’s long-standing arguments based on the sanctity of treaties. Drought conditions — likely to become more pronounced with the changing climate — converged in 2015 to 2016 with increased water usage and pollution in Johor to challenge the foundation of the bilateral water partnership.

The domestic political considerations and diplomatic underpinnings of water pricing in this cross-border region were already tenuous, and growing water stresses may well make them more so. Responding to this situation will require regulatory diligence and clear-minded diplomacy by the authorities in Johor and Singapore as well as in Kuala Lumpur.

Specifically, it is in Singapore’s interest to continue its collaboration with Malaysia on Johor’s catchment management, given its dependence and its considerable experience in the sector.

Diversifying imports to include sources from Riau, Indonesia, is also not beyond imagination, but has been made less likely by the island’s progress in its domestic water sector. Regardless of the specific mechanisms used, it is important that such resource protection and management efforts do not fall victim to the rush for economic growth. If this occurs, such growth might undermine the very cross-border relations that it calls upon and attempts to strengthen.



ABOUT THE AUTHORS:
Jackson Ewing is Director of Asian Sustainability and Karissa Domondon is an Intern at the Asia Society Policy Institute, Asia Society. This is an excerpt of a longer piece in Perspective, published by ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute.

A more comprehensive study of the subject is included in the recent ISEAS book The Sijori Cross-Border Region. Transnational Politics, Economics and Culture.

Article source: TODAY Online



Read more here:


SG Ministry of Foreign Affairs publication: Water Talks? – If Only It Could.
A succinct account of the 1998-2003 SG-Msia negotiations on several bilateral issues, including the price of raw water.  (Back up copy)

SG Ministry of Foreign Affairs publication: Singapore-Malaysia Water Talks: What are the Facts?
(Back up copy)

Ministry of Foreign Affairs Press Release - WATER ISSUE IS ABOUT SANCTITY OF AGREEMENTS, NOT ABOUT PRICE ALONE, SAYS SINGAPORE FOREIGN MINISTER PROF S JAYAKUMAR (Back up copy)

TODAY - The Big Read: Receding water levels at Linggiu Reservoir expose Singapore’s vulnerability

Channel NewsAsia - Receding water levels at Linggiu Reservoir expose Singapore’s vulnerability

Channel NewsAsia - In pictures: Ground zero of Malaysia's water crisis

TODAY - Climate change forces S’pore to look at 5th desalination plant, in Jurong

TODAY - Water shortage in Malaysia a timely reminder to save resource: Masagos

TODAY - Malaysia warns of continuing drought as Malacca sounds water shortage alarm

Straits Times: Water level in Linggiu Reservoir hits record low, continued dry spell could affect Singapore

Straits Times: JB downpour fails to raise reservoir level

Straits Times: Singapore's water supply: Where does it come from?

Straits Times - Ensuring there's enough water - always

PUB - The Singapore Water Story

PUB - NEWater - The 3rd National Tap

Lee Kuan Yew: The architect of Singapore's water story

Lee Kuan Yew - On Sustainability

Vulnerability to Strength: the Singapore Water Story

Forging a greener tomorrow

Tech Insider: Singapore has come up with an ingenious way to save water

Water Lessons from Singapore

Singapore Will Cut Water Imports from Malaysia, Pursue Self-Sufficiency

Singapore Taps Waste Water and Tops Water Innovation

Bottling Wastewater Expands Island’s Oasis—Singapore’s NEWater Path to Independence

Read previous posts about Singapore and Water




Wednesday, September 14, 2016

Singapore's Water concerns


Aerial Photos of Linggiu Reservoir in Johor. 
Top - Reservoir at 25% capacity. Bottom - Reservoir at 100% capacity.
(Top: Photo by LHL; Bottom: Photo from Google Earth)

By PM Lee Hsien Loong via Facebook
Took this aerial photo (top) of Linggiu Reservoir in Johor on the way to China two weeks ago. The reservoir is only 25% full, after several dry years of low rainfall. The bottom photo, taken off Google Earth, shows what the reservoir looks like when full. The difference is stark, and worrying.

Singapore is fortunate to be sheltered from many natural disasters, but our water supply is still at the mercy of the weather. Our Four National Taps (http://bit.ly/2cq1tfW) have mitigated this, but we must still do all we can to conserve water. Use water wisely, avoid waste, and recycle wherever possible. Find out more ways to save precious water here: https://www.pub.gov.sg/savewater – LHL


=================

If you were living in Singapore,  you wouldn't have known that Singapore is potentially facing a problem on the horizon in its water supply.

After all, our taps are all still flowing with clean drinkable water even though the weather hasn't been exactly kind to the region. March 2016 was one of our driest and hottest in recent times.

And the water situation in our region is becoming more serious.

There has been a drought in Malaysia with several of their reservoirs at below 50% capacity. And this has lead to a once unimaginable situation of Malaysia asking Singapore to supply more treated water. Perhaps a more direct impact of the Malaysian drought is the resulting smaller durian harvests and the increases in durian prices.

Thailand, Philippines, Indonesia, Cambodia, Vietnam and Myanmar have all been affected as well. As the Wall Street Journal puts it, 'El Nino wreaks havoc across Southeast Asia.'

But obviously, Singapore has been doing much to mitigate the impact of this looming water crisis in the region. In April 2016, the Govt announced that it will be building not just one, but two more desalination plants to further enhance our water resilience. When completed, Singapore would have 5 desalination plants, in addition to the four NEWater Plants (recycled water).

So please, when you turn on that tap today, do try to use less water. Every drop is precious.

=================

What are Singapore's 4 National Taps?

See here for more about our four National Taps.






Read more here:

TODAY - The Big Read: Receding water levels at Linggiu Reservoir expose Singapore’s vulnerability

Channel NewsAsia - Receding water levels at Linggiu Reservoir expose Singapore’s vulnerability

Channel NewsAsia - In pictures: Ground zero of Malaysia's water crisis

TODAY - Climate change forces S’pore to look at 5th desalination plant, in Jurong

TODAY - Water shortage in Malaysia a timely reminder to save resource: Masagos

TODAY - Malaysia warns of continuing drought as Malacca sounds water shortage alarm

Straits Times: Water level in Linggiu Reservoir hits record low, continued dry spell could affect Singapore

Straits Times: JB downpour fails to raise reservoir level

Lee Kuan Yew: The architect of Singapore's water story

Lee Kuan Yew - On Sustainability

Vulnerability to Strength: the Singapore Water Story

Forging a greener tomorrow

Tech Insider: Singapore has come up with an ingenious way to save water

Read previous posts about Singapore and Water



Saturday, September 3, 2016

The vicious lies being spread by the "Alternative Media" during the Zika outbreak

Here are just some of the blatant and vicious lies that are being spread by the "alternative media".



The Independent SG tries to smear the Govt by falsely claiming that NEA will not help WP MPs. 





Look at rubbish site The Alternative Media spreading lies about how MOH & NEA not taking actions when they know about the zika infection a month back (31st July)! Now they want our Ministers Gan Kim Yong and Chee Hong Tat to resign because of the "lapses" and due to the Zika epidemic?

FACT: MOH & NEA only knew about the zika infection after that backtrack the cases when the Doctors at the GP had their suspicion after a spike in fever cases on the 22nd Aug!

So what lapses are they talking about when it only take them 6 days to backtrack and test to confirm there were 41 Zika cases in total on the 28th July? And to also resign because Zika has reached our shores which is totally unpreventable?

Come lim peh clap for you!



Alex Tan claims that our Minister Ong Ye Kung have zero medical training yet able to conclude that Zika is a mild illness? Alex Tan is stupid? Does the minister need conclude anything when Doctors and experts have already confirmed that Zika is indeed a mild illness with shows mild symptoms or even no symptoms when infected? Pic: Shut Down TRS FB page
Sources:





"If I don't make the people angry, they won't vote for me." This is essentially the opposition's strategy at getting votes. What best time to apply this strategy than when there is a health scare: Zika outbreak.


Instead of standing together to allay fears and boost the public confidence in our public servants combatting the outbreaks, these overnight health experts chose to misrepresent the timeline of events, spread false information, and raise questions that cast aspersion on the integrity of the the public servants.

Their attempts can create public alarms, a frustrated public can get angry and lose confidence in the public servants doing their best to safeguard Singaporeans well being. This makes the public servants job more difficult that it is already.

Spread false information: when CSJ asserted that first case was 31 Jul when 31 Jul is actually just a postulation. It makes it seems that the govt knew of Zika at least a month before announcing it. Pic: FAP





Chee Soon Juan continues to use Zika spread half-truths to attack logic



Singapore Demoncratic Democratic Party (SDP) Chief Chee Soon Juan continues to take advantage of the current Zika outbreak to spread half-truths to create a climate of fear and feed conspiracy theories of cover-ups

In a FB post on 2 Sept 2016, Chee Soon Juan disingenuously strings together a timeline of events to imply that the sudden explosion in the numbers of Zika cases was due to the Govt's incompetence and stated that "the Govt must be held accountable".

Well, we do wonder where Chee Soon Juan is getting his information. Afterall, SDP has in its ranks, an expert in infectious diseases, Prof Paul Ananth Tambyah.

Has CSJ consulted Prof Tambyah if the Govt's response and actions on the current Zika outbreak has been appropriate and adequate?

And if there was indeed a Govt attempt to "cover-up" the extend of the outbreak, Prof Tambyah would know right? Afterall, he is working in NUH as a Senior Consultant in the Division of Infectious Diseases.

But Prof Tambyah has made no such allegations of any cover-ups or incompetence on his own Facebook page. Instead his latest FB post on the Zika outbreak was on the WHO press conference on the Zika outbreak where WHO's Executive Director for the Health Emergency Programme, Dr Peter Salama, praised Singapore for their response to the Zika outbreak.

In an interview with Straits Times on 22 May 2016, this is what Prof Tambyah had to say:

Professor Paul Tambyah, an infectious diseases expert who is secretary-general of the Asia-Pacific Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infection, said: "People might think that they just have a flu-like illness, with a non-specific rash." 
He added, however, that the risk that the virus continues to circulate silently in the neighbourhood is low, given heightened public awareness and the NEA's prompt action.


Even Dr Chi, one of the three doctors who raised the alarm over the possibility of a local Zika infection, did not think there was any cover-up. See Dr Chi's FB Post here.



Instead of sharing factual information about the Zika virus, CSJ has chosen to use this outbreak to spread half-truths to create distrust in not only the PAP Govt but in our own healthcare and public health agencies.

Does CSJ really have the interests of Singaporean at heart? 

Look at all of CSJ's statements about the Zika virus. All he does is to mindlessly criticize the actions and tries to push the myth of a govt cover-up. Does he give any helpful suggestions or point out any possible blind spots?

Does he spare a thought for our public healthcare professionals from NEA as well as MOH who are hard at work dealing with the outbreak? What about their professionalism and integrity? Are they not Singaporeans too?

This latest antic by CSJ only demonstrates how ready CSJ is to sacrifice Singaporeans's interest to further his own selfish interests and political career.


Other recent Zika related posts from SDP/CSJ

Stop fearmongering! False info put out by SDP... SDP claimed that the “first case was detected on 31 July 2016. This claim is false. The first case detected was on 27 Aug 2016 and after MOH’s investigation, then it was traced back to 31 July.

Quoting Minister Gan, “It was not a case whereby we did not know, and there’s sudden emergence of these cases. Out of 41 cases, 36 were (detected) due to this active testing.” Pic: FLOP








Read more here:


Reference [1]

Reference [2]

Reference [3]


WHO - Press conference on Zika virus, with Dr Peter Salama, Executive Director for the Health Emergency Programme (Singapore reference: From 22.00min onwards).

TODAY: Singapore a ‘role model’ in handling Zika outbreak: WHO

Dr Chi Wei Ming's Facebook Post on the Zika outbreak
Min of Health, Singapore on the Zika Virus

Singapore Government - Zika Virus

The Straits Times - All you need to know about the Zika virus and the threat it poses

Channel News Asia - Challenging to contain Zika virus: Health experts

The New York Times - Short Answers to Hard Questions About Zika Virus.