Monday, August 22, 2016

Alex Tan Zhixiang - Vile Hypocrite, Unrepentant Liar and Gutless Coward



Alex Tan Zhixiang, aka States Times Review website Admin, is a particularly vile hypocrite, unrepentant liar and all-time gutless coward.

He constant spews forth half-truths, manufactured “facts” and constantly posts xenophobic articles on his website.

And he seems to have a pathological hatred for anything PAP.





So it is really at all surprising that Alex Tan Zhixiang gleefully reacted to PM Lee's fainting spell during the National Day Rally? 

Nope, it is not surprising at all given his entire online history of posting such heartless comments. In fact, it is expected that he would react that way.



Alex Tan, being the spineless coward he is, has already deleted his original FB post after seeing the backlash to his post.



After deleting his original FB post wishing PM the worst, he now claims he is "genuinely concerned" for PM's health in the comments. 




And if that is not bullshit enough, Alex Tan Zhixiang pretends to be impartial and declares that "there is freedom of speech here for everyone".




Please lah, we all know what sort of a unprincipled, two-headed hypocritical coward you are. 

Why are you even trying to pretend to be fair and unbiased? 




Source: Alex Tan's personal FB page which has since been long deleted.


Source: Alex Tan's personal FB page which has since been long deleted.



The Disgusting and Morally-bankrupt Opposition personalities in Singapore

So PM Lee stumbled, appeared to have been fainting or ill during his annual National Day Rally speech.

And immediately, we see our two opposition MP-wannabees clowns personalities posting heartless remarks on social media.

S'pore Democratic Party Chief Chee Soon Juan's original Tweet




Reform Party Chief Kenneth Jeyaretnam's original Tweet



You can disagree on everything that your political opponent does or say. You can (figuratively speaking) fight tooth and nail over policy.

But when you have to resort to wishing illness and death on them simply just to advance your political agenda and score points with your supporters, you are simply exposing your own immature disposition and shallowness of character to the rest of Singapore.


It does not matter what your political views or preference is, Singapore cannot afford to elect such unprincipled and immature people into Parliament. 



CSJ's same FB posting which was subsequently amended, and amended and amended...




KJ deleted his original tweet after suffering backlash on Tweeter but obviously he is still unapologetic for his original tweet as evidenced by his subsequent excuses. Is this the sort of person whom you want representing Singaporeans in Parliament?


Update (23 Aug)
The Independent SG is trying to make excuses for KJ.

Pic: Shut Down TRS - Guess TISG and Kenneth think Singaporeans are stupid to believe that Kenneth Jeyaretnam's insensitive twitter post is due to him thinking it was an autocue error that caused PM Lee to falter!!


What else can be said about KJ and CSJ, except for this?






Friday, August 19, 2016

Workers Party tries desperately to throw smoke to score points

So WP seems to be trying to use this little piece of new from the 5th Monthly Progress Report issued by KPMG to AHTC to boost their reputation.

Notice how they emphasize the "100% KPMG Check" and "No Duplicate or fictitious payments found" on their Facebook post.



If you didn't read the entire 5th Monthly Progress Report, it is likely that you would think that the Audit is going well for WP, that things are getting sorted out.

Unfortunately that is NOT the case.



So really, what WP is trying to do is to distract your attention with some little piece of good news. By doing so, they hope that you won't actually go and read the actual 5th Monthly Progress Report for yourself.




Because if you read the 5th Monthly Progress Report, you will soon realize that that the AHPETC / AHTC Accounts mess is really a big pile of crap that has yet to be significantly cleared up.

Remember what WP kept on claiming during the elections - that they have "more than 20 years of experience in managing Town councils."





Read more here:

5th Monthly Progress Report

AHPETC /AHTC Posts

TODAY: AHTC’s dummy code not fictitious, but processes weak: KPMG


Thursday, August 18, 2016

Hear direct from Law Minister Shanmugam on the Administration of Justice (Protection) Bill

Instead of speculating what the Administration of Justice (Protection) Bill is all about, why not listen directly to what the Law Minister has to say on this for yourself?


Law Minister Shanmugam on Administration of Justice (Protection) Bill


Law Minister Shanmugam responds to questions on the Administration of Justice (Protection) Bill 









Read more here:

TODAY: Heated debate in Parliament as contempt Bill passed

Ministry of Law: New Bill on Protection of the Administration of Justice

Straits Times: Second Reading Speech by Minister for Law, Mr K Shanmugam, on the Administration of Justice (Protection) Bill

Straits Times: Parliament: New law spells out penalties for contempt of court, failure to comply with orders

Straits Times: Parliament: FAQs on contempt of court

TODAY: New law meant to deter public from expressing views, says WP

Straits Times: NMPs seek changes to Bill that spells out contempt of court

[Defending the Lion City] SCDF fights huge fire at CK Building at Tampines

A fire broke out at around 1.30pm on Wednesday (17 Aug) at the CK Building at Tampines St 92. 

The SCDF dispatched 110 officers and 27 emergency vehicles, including fire engines, support vehicles and ambulances to fight the blaze. 

Major fire-fighting operations ended at about 6am on Thursday (18 Aug).

To all the brave Firemen and Home Team personnel, both Regulars and NSFs, thank you so much for your bravery and for your service in protecting Singapore.




Read more here:


Wednesday, August 17, 2016

TOC gets slammed by netizens within minutes of its posting




So as usual, TOC tries to stoke fears of speaking up with yet another article whose author claims to be fearful of government persecution.

And within minutes of its posting, netizens are slamming TOC for its disingenuous post.



WP kungfu simply cannot make it - Round 2: Administration of Justice (Protection) Bill

On 15 Aug 2016, Workers' Party Chief Low Thia Khiang clumsily attempted to cast aspersions on the Administration of Justice (Protection) Bill in Parliament.

However, in doing so, LTK exposed his own ignorance (or perhaps he is simply intentionally presenting half of the facts behind the bill) of what the Bill was about as well as its scope.

And Minister for Law, Mr K Shanmugam utterly destroys Low Thia Khiang's feeble claims.




This graphic shows how LTK was trying to smoke Singaporeans with his ignorance (or blatant presentation of half the facts).




What is the Administration of Justice (Protection) Bill all about?

Here are some infographics from the Ministry of Law to help you understand.



And here are some online commentary about the Bill and how the debate in Parliament went.

Contempt law debate- a good day for Singapore 
By I Tahan You Very Long Already 
It was good fun watching the news last night. On the one hand, you have the good-intentioned technocrats from the ruling party trying to use facts and logic to explain why we need to have the contempt law written down properly for Singapore courts. 
In the other corner of the ring, Workers’ Party MPs were essentially using emotions to try to tug the heartstrings of voters; the big bully versus the man-in the-street narrative which they so often and conveniently pulled out to scare Singaporeans . Do not let these elites rule over you. We will protect your freedom, they say. 
When you break it all down, the WP was basically politicking without adding anything new to the debate. Most of the points they raised could have been brought up even before the introduction of the bill. But why didn’t they bring it up? 
Read the complete post here.

What is this new Administration of Justice Bill and should you be angry? 
By Benjamin Chiang, Five Stars and a Moon 
I don’t see why you should really. If a case is before the courts, a normal people would let the legal system do its work. Doesn’t matter if it’s Roy Ngerng, or Teo Soh Lung or Kong Hee – they have a right to fair trial and a fair trial means a system that is free of influence and prejudice. 
After the trial is over, you and every other media has a right to voice their opinions again and the defendant has the right to appeal with new facts, moving his case to a higher court. 
In today’s age of social media and online vigilantism, wrong data can go viral in just a few clicks. How many times have you grilled someone wrongfully and then regretted it when a counter story was posted? 
It would be a very sad day when an accused who has yet to face trial ends up bearing the full brunt of an online campaign designed to destroy his/her reputation. 
Read the complete post here.

And even the three Nominated MPs (NMPs) -  Mr Mahdev Mohan, Mr Kok Heng Leun and Ms Kuik Shiao-Yin - whom originally had concerns about this bill, and had proposed amendments to it, changed their minds after Mr K Shanmugam addressed their concerns in Parliament.

At the end of the 7-hour Parliamentary debate on this particular Bill, all three NMPs - withdrew their proposed changes and voted for the Bill.

Shiao-yin Kuik explains in a Facebook post (see below) why the NMPs changed their mind. And for her troubles, she is slandered by a rabid Anti-Govt / Opposition supporter.








Read more here:

TODAY: Heated debate in Parliament as contempt Bill passed

Ministry of Law: New Bill on Protection of the Administration of Justice

Straits Times: Second Reading Speech by Minister for Law, Mr K Shanmugam, on the Administration of Justice (Protection) Bill

Straits Times: Parliament: New law spells out penalties for contempt of court, failure to comply with orders

Straits Times: Parliament: FAQs on contempt of court

TODAY: New law meant to deter public from expressing views, says WP

Straits Times: NMPs seek changes to Bill that spells out contempt of court