Showing posts with label Roy Ng. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Roy Ng. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 1, 2017

Amos Yee goes to 'Jail' again....

Part 1 - Amos is detained after he told US Immigration he was seeking asylum

Part 2 - Amos is denied release and will be detained until his hearing on 7 March. 



Update (4 Feb): 
According to various media reports, Amos will not be released and instead will be detained by the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) until his court hearing on 7 March 2017 which apparently is inline with President Trump's "new directives". By then, Amos would have been in detention for 80 days - which is almost twice as long as the 42 days (or 6 weeks) jail sentence Amos had to serve for 'wounding religious feelings'.  A quick search on Google seems to overwhelmingly suggest that conditions in the US immigration detention centres are depressingly bleak at best (like this and this). Maybe Amos can pull his depression/suicide stun again to try and gain some sympathy. Whatever it is, Amos reaps what he sows.

Oh, and where are all his supporters? How come there is still no talk of holding a "vigil" or protest to demand his release from detention?




Just when we had all but forgotten about Amos Yee, out he pops like a yellow pimple with yet another stunt.

This time, he’s gone over to the US to seek “political asylum”, and probably to escape his National Service duties as well.

We wouldn’t have bothered posting about him since posting news about him only feeds his egomania but the irony here is too great/funny.

Amos had probably thought that America would welcome him like a Hero, since he was escaping from an ‘authoritarian’ country which has 'denied' his desire for 'absolute' free speech. So when he landed, Amos told the US Immigration Officer that he was seeking asylum. 

Next thing you know, he’s been sent off to Jail where he’s been detained pending a hearing on his asylum application, which apparently can take a really long time.

And now that things have not gone the way he had expected, he’s now complaining about the US.


The sweet irony - Amos could potentially be detained in the US for longer than what he was sentenced to in S'pore.


You can read more about his situation at the links below, if you can be bothered to.

But all we can say is good riddance to bad rubbish. 

America, you are more than welcomed to keep Amos for yourselves. Please don’t send him back to us. 





And we also wonder where did all of Amos’s fans and supporters disappear to. Afterall, Amos needs more money to fund his "escape from Singapore". 

So where are all his  suckers supporters?













Five Stars And a Moon - Amos Yee’s plan backfires









Tuesday, June 7, 2016

Bodoh Activists who just crave attention



Looks like Roy "justified-in-scaring-children-for-CPF" Ng is back in the limelight yet again.

We guess it's either he backside itchy is just craving for attention after falling out from the public's eye, or he's ran out of money looking for an excuse to launch another con gullible people's money donation drive to fund yet another potential court case about his next european holiday freedom of speech.


From Onward Singapore FB page:
Testing Fate on Cooling Day

The Independent Singapore ‪#‎TISG‬, ‪#‎royngerg‬ and ‪#‎teosohlung‬ were all courting disaster, to put it in simple terms.

Alternate sites and noises online are trying to divert netizens' attention from the crux of the issue, which is "Why did they make election advertising posting on Cooling Day?"
The police raided the house, took my laptop, phone blah blah blah is just a distraction.
2 points we want to state here on ‪#‎onwardsingapore‬
Firstly, the system is fair.
 
In 2001, ‪#‎nicoleseah‬ made a Facebook post on Polling Day. Investigations found that the posting was made by a party volunteer, the explanation was acceped and no further action was taken against her.

Secondly, TISG, Ngerg and Teo acted deliberately.

Assistant Returning Officer(AGO) specifically reminded TISG not to post any election advertising. As for Teo and Ngerg, they regularly engage in promotion and discussion of political issues. Being social media gurus, they ought to know that the content they post are related to election advertising.

There is no abuse of power. All parties involved have been acting against their judgement, wanting to throw their weight behind Chee Soon Juan.

This is an obvious case of blantant disregard to the regulations and now is the time to face the music. If in doubt, they should not have posted anything. Suck it up. 
Cheerz
Onward Singapore


Read more here:

Press Statement jointly issued by Elections Department (ELD) and the Singapore Police Force

I Tahan You Very Long Already - Cooling Off Day breaches since 2011… and what happened to them

Mothership - Here are the posts that allegedly violated the Bukit Batok by-election cooling-off day rules















Monday, December 28, 2015

Supporters of Amos the Banana-Boy - "No Sound, No Picture??"




Amos says that he is playing hide and seek with on the run from the police.

But strangely enough, all the usual anti-government / anti-PAP groups and personalities are really quiet where Amos is concerned.

Has anyone wondered what happened to all of Amos Yee's ardent supporters?

Earlier in July 2015, they were all out in full of force, showing their support for Amos, to the extent of holding a candlelight vigil for him, and even travelling all the way to Hong Kong to drum up support for Amos.

Seems to me (at least via their respective FB timelines & websites as of 28 Dec 2015) that they have stopped posting any news of Amos, including banana-boy's latest antic of being a "fugitive of the law".

As they say in hokkien, "Bo Xai, Bo Se" (literally translated "No Sound No Picture").


(1) Kenneth Jeyaretnam, Secretary-General of the Reform Party

Kenneth Jeyaretnam, had very strong words of support for Amos in June 2015 - calling him "Singapore's Youngest Political Prisoner". He even posted a picture of himself with duct-tape over his mouth and holding a 'FreeAmos' placard.  LOL   A quick scan of his FB page shows no mention of Amos since Sept 2015.



(2) Roy Ngerng Yi Ling (2015 Reform Party Candidate; YMCA Event 2014 Heckler)

Roy "ReturnOurCPF" Ngerng has nothing on his FB timeline about Amos since Sept 2015 too. His infamous blog of Charts, Tables and excessive dribble has nothing new since Sept too.

Gasp! Has Roy, who onced called Amos "Teacher", deserted Amos and left him to his fate? Well, maybe he's busy trying to think of ways to milk the situation get more money so that he can help himself Amos?

Roy (33yr) regards Amos (17yr) as a "Teacher" Ho Say Bo?


(3) Jolovan Wham

How about Jolovan Wham - supporter of anything and everything related to "Freedom of Speech"? Nope, his FB timeline is also zero.




Even the "CAN" FB page, which describes itself as ".... a group of individuals and activists concerned about freedom of expression in Singapore. We came together because of A Yee.", hasn't even a squeak about Amos since August 2015.

Maybe Jolovan is really busy with other more ego-stroking important stuff and overlooked Amos....



(4) Amos's International Supporters (lead by Goh Meng Seng & Han Hui Hui) 

Nope... we haven't seen a repeat of the Hong Kong Protesters yet, or Taiwan or Malaysia or China.

Even Goh Meng Seng and Han Hui Hui's respective FB pages have no recent mention of Amos.

Maybe the HK protesters are waiting for Goh Meng Seng and Han Hui Hui to go and pay lead them in yet another protest.



(5) MARUAH
The president of Maruah, a Human Rights NGO in Singapore, had rambled on spoken for almost 20mins at the Free Amos Yee Rally on 5 July 2015.


But the Maruah FB page has nothing recent on Amos too.

Looks like Maruah is more interested in getting more attention speaking up at some human-rights festival conference in Geneva. Hang on... isn't that the perfect opportunity to get some international media attention for Amos's current plight? How come no mention at all leh? Why Maruah? Why? We thought you cared.

Maybe the harsh reality is this: That they have all come to realise Amos has got nothing to do with "freedom of speech" as what they love to champion. Amos has been using them all along to boost his attention-seeking ego.

And this also goes to show how "principled"our irritating beloved freedom champions are: If you are of no use to advancing their agenda, you are quickly kicked aside and forgotten.



PS: Yeah I know I said I won't post any more about Amos, unless he did something really stupid unusual... but then again, this post isn't entirely about Amos.   :D



Friday, December 18, 2015

Either Alex is a barefaced liar, or he can't read english for nuts

Alex must be smoking something really powerful downunder...either that or he must have failed his english reading comprehension.


This is what was quoted by Channel News Asia on 17 Dec 2015 about the Judgement.

"While the cases indicate that the damages awarded to Prime Ministers who have been defamed have been substantial, some in excess of S$300,000, none of them involved a defendant of modest standing. The comparatively low standing of the defendant warranted a substantial reduction" - Justice Lee Seiu Kin

The judge went on to say:

However the popularity of Ngerng's blog and his "portrayal of himself as the voice of truth were not indicative of his standing amongst Singaporeans". There was "no evidence of his perceived credibility or the influence he actually wielded," hence his standing warranted a lower award of damages, said the judge.


The word "Standing" here as used by the Judge is in reference to the person's reputation, influence or position, and NOT in reference to how wealthy/poor the person is.  Besides, a poor person can still be immensely influential - like Mother Teresa.

"Low Standing" --> As much as Roy thinks he's some significant, voice of truth influential person in Singapore, the Judge actually doesn't see him that way. Justice Lee illustrated this point by drawing this comparison:

"The words of a dishevelled tramp in a street corner would be far less capable of causing damage than that of the CEO of a multi-national company."


(Ouch! That must have really hurt Roy's ego. heheee...)

So, which part of the Judgement said or implied anything about "poor people" better know their "social standing" before "criticizing"?

If anything, the Judge's opinion that Roy is in reality a insignificant bugger blogger , actually saved Roy from the prospect of heftier damages.

As usual, Alex Tan Zhixiang has yet again demonstrated his amazing propensity to lie ability to butcher the english language into something else to serve his devious agenda.





Don't take my work for it. Read the Judgement yourself for much more juicy details of what the Judge thought of the case.

Download the Judgement here. (Original source: Singapore Law Watch - [2015]SGHC 320)

Here are some extracts:


"Because damages in defamation are for injury to reputation, it is quite evident that the standing of the defamer is relevant to the degree of injury. In my view, there is a continuum of damages that is commensurate with the standing, or lack of it, of the defamer. The words of a dishevelled tramp in a street corner would be far less capable of causing damage than that of the CEO of a multi-national company." Page 26, Para 39


"He also points to the defendant’s portrayal of himself as the voice of truth, and that the defendant had considered himself to have a significant standing amongst Singaporeans. I accept that the defendant had made many representations in the Blog to that effect. But there is nothing to show that he had in fact enjoyed such standing – there is no evidence of his perceived credibility or the influence he actually wielded." Page 27, Para 42


"In the present case, I am of the view that a substantial reduction would be appropriate in the circumstances of the case, primarily in view of the comparatively low standing of the defendant." Page 71, Para 116


================================================================



Blogger Roy Ngerng ordered to pay PM Lee S$150,000 in damages
 "The comparatively low standing of the defendant warranted a substantial reduction" in the award of damages, said the judge.

By Vanessa Paige Chelvan, CNA, Posted 17 Dec 2015 17:27 Updated 17 Dec 2015 22:45 

SINGAPORE: The Supreme Court on Thursday (Dec 17) ordered blogger Roy Ngerng to pay S$150,000 in damages to Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong for defamation. This comprises S$100,000 in general damages and S$50,000 in aggravated damages.

"While the cases indicate that the damages awarded to Prime Ministers who have been defamed have been substantial, some in excess of S$300,000, none of them involved a defendant of modest standing. The comparatively low standing of the defendant warranted a substantial reduction," a judgement from Justice Lee Seiu Kin stated.

The 34-year-old Ngerng, a former healthcare programme coordinator at Tan Tock Seng Hospital, had written a blogpost in May 2014 allegedly comparing the Government's usage of CPF monies to the City Harvest Church leaders' alleged misuse of church funds. In his blog, he charged that the Government did so via the Government’s investment arms, Temasek Holdings and GIC.

The blogger was ordered by the court to no longer publish any assertions that Mr Lee was misappropriating CPF monies. He was also ordered to pay Mr Lee S$29,000 for legal fees and related expenses that were borne leading up to the application for the summary judgment.

ALLEGATIONS "SEVERELY UNDERMINED CREDIBILITY OF TARGET"

The judge held that allegations of corrupt and criminal conduct could have severe repercussions, especially if levelled against the leader of a country. "In the present case, the allegations that the plaintiff had criminally misappropriated monies paid by citizens to a state-administered pension fund was one of the gravest that could be made against any individual, let alone a head of Government. It struck at the heart of one’s personal integrity and severely undermined the credibility of the target, and was a grave defamation that a fair-minded person would react with indignation," the judgement read.

"Public leaders in Singapore hold positions of trust and confidence and their reputations are vital to their ability to lead and to be given the mandate to govern", Justice Lee added.

Justice Lee noted that while Ngerng had apologised to Prime Minister Lee, it could be concluded from articles and emails he wrote after that he was "not contrite". For instance, he sent emails regarding the takedown of his blogpost to journalists. He also published a Letter of Demand sent to him - a move that was "aggravating" in serving to increase the reach of his defamatory material and the likelihood of its publication.

NGERNG "NOT CONTRITE" AFTER APOLOGY

The judge also concluded that the defendant's conduct was "malicious" as Ngerng knew his blogpost claims were false and injurious to Mr Lee, but still published it. "It was likely that the defendant had cynically defamed the plaintiff in order to increase viewership of the blog," the judgement read. Blog statistics show the article was seen by at least 37,223 individuals.

However the popularity of Ngerng's blog and his "portrayal of himself as the voice of truth were not indicative of his standing amongst Singaporeans". There was "no evidence of his perceived credibility or the influence he actually wielded," hence his standing warranted a lower award of damages, said the judge.

Justice Lee illustrated this point by drawing this comparison: "The words of a dishevelled tramp in a street corner would be far less capable of causing damage than that of the CEO of a multi-national company."

In July, Prime Minister Lee himself took the stand for about six hours for the hearing. His lawyers asked for "a very high award of damages", citing "malice and continuing attacks" by the blogger on Mr Lee. The court also heard that Mr Ngerng had offered to settle the damages for a sum of S$10,000 but this was rejected by PM Lee as "derisory".

Ngerng had previously argued that the award of “extravagant damages” sends the signal to other Singaporeans that they will “have to ‘self-censor and keep their thoughts to themselves’”. But this is not true, Justice Lee said.

The blogger “has not been prevented from speaking on the purported mismanagement of the CPF monies, nor has he been prevented from criticising (Prime Minister Lee) or any other politician”. In fact, Ngerng has published multiple articles critical of Government policies, Justice Lee noted.

In response to media queries, the press secretary to Prime Minister Lee said he accepts the judgement and award of the court.

Ngerng wrote in a Facebook post that he is discussing next steps with his lawyer, but added: "I have put the case behind me and am trying to move on with my life."

- CNA/ly



Thursday, December 17, 2015

Roy gets new excuse for fund-raising again


So, we hear today that Roy was ordered to pay PM Lee Hsien Loong $150,000 for defamation.

Hmmm.... I wonder what's going through Roy's mind.

Not enough? Too much? Free $$$ time? Oppressed? No freedom of speech? No CPF? Return my CPF?

meh.. who really cares?

Some dumb good people have too much money to spare sacrifice their hard-earn cash to support our looney MP-wannabes potential MPs  .

After all, if not for them, Singapore wouldn't have much political comedy drama and anyone to disturb our peace fight for our freedoms.

So remember to donate all you can afford for this stupid liar of a con-man great and worthwhile cause

======================


hahaha.. this is solid gold.

Roy has to ".... work hard to be honest people".


============================================

hahahahahah..... A very good question.



============================================


Oh yeah.. please do. Alex, help Roy please. Get him outta this awful country. And while you are at it, help Amos too. Oh, and then there's Han Hui Hui also. Please help them all to leave Singapore.


Monday, October 26, 2015

'Return Our CPF' protester let off with warning


POSTED: 23 Oct 2015 10:30 UPDATED: 23 Oct 2015 11:29 
By Justin Ong

SINGAPORE: Goh Aik Huat, part of a group charged with public nuisance for their "Return Our CPF" protests in September 2014, was let off with a conditional warning on Friday (Oct 23).

The 42-year-old made a public apology in court on Friday. Judge Luke Tan granted him a discharge not amounting to an acquittal.

"I wish to apologise to the court. I'm sorry and I undertake not to repeat this again," said Goh, speaking in Chinese. "I hope your honour can grant me one last chance."

Goh had begun the trial without representation, but was later defended by lawyer Suang Wijaya.

In a media statement, the Attorney-General’s Chambers said that the prosecution had decided to discontinue the prosecution against Goh, and directed the Police to administer a 24-month conditional warning to him instead.

This was based on "Goh’s culpability relative to that of the other co-accused persons, his willingness to apologise unreservedly to those affected by his conduct on Sep 27, 2014 and undertake not to engage in such conduct in future, as well as his conduct during the trial", according to the AGC statement.

This was administered by the Police on Oct 21. Should Goh commit any fresh offence within the 24-month period, he may be prosecuted for both the fresh offence and the nuisance offence, said the AGC.

Along with Han Hui Hui, 24, Koh Yew Beng, 60 and Low Wai Choo, 50, Goh was accused of disrupting a YMCA community event held at Hong Lim Park in September last year.

The four, together with Roy Ngerng, 34, and Chua Siew Leng, 43 - both of whom have since pleaded guilty - were at their "Return Our CPF" protest rally which took place at the same time and location.

Ngerng was fined S$1,900 and Chua fined S$300. A total of eight people have been issued the 24-month conditional warning arising from the Sep 27, 2014 incident, according to the AGC.

For Han, Koh and Low, the trial will continue on Feb 24 to 26, 2016. The three have not had legal representation in court since the commencement of the trial.


Sources:
Channel News Asia - 'Return Our CPF' protester let off with warning
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/return-our-cpf-protester/2212210.html?cid=FBSG

Image: Singapore Matters
https://www.facebook.com/SingaporeMatters/photos/a.710662802353449.1073741828.710654255687637/887385938014467/?type=3&theater


Thursday, October 15, 2015

Han Hui Hui's Public Nuisance Trial (Day 2) - No remorse shown

(Day 2 of Trial)

Hong Lim Park protests affected special needs children, says YMCA executive


Organisers of Proms @ the Park event were told there would be "another speech" held at Speakers' Corner two days before the event. Four, including Ms Han Hui Hui, are contesting their charge of causing a public nuisance during a protest on Sep 27, 2014.

By Edric Sng, POSTED: 14 Oct 2015 17:17 UPDATED: 15 Oct 2015 08:28

SINGAPORE: An executive with YMCA who was part of the organising team for the organisation's Proms @ the Park event on Sep 27 last year said she believed that the actions of protesters - including Ms Han Hui Hui and three co-accused who were on trial on Wednesday (Oct 14) - affected the special needs children at the event.

(Looks like HHH got what she wished for.)

Blogger Han Hui Hui, 24, and three co-accused, Low Wai Choo, 54, Goh Aik Huat, 41, Koh Yew Beng, 59, are facing public nuisance charges for disrupting a community event held at Hong Lim Park on Sep 27, 2014, by shouting loudly, chanting slogans, waving flags, holding placards, blowing whistles and beating drums.

Their actions are alleged to have disrupted the YMCA event that was also being held there, and affected the special needs children who were performing during that event.

The four accused represented themselves in court.

Prosecution witness Samantha Seah, head of programmes at YMCA, said organisers had been informed by National Parks on Sep 25 - two days before the event - that there would be another event held that day. YMCA said they would proceed with the event as planning for it had already been ongoing for at least six months. NParks administers the booking of Speakers' Corner.

Ms Seah, 45, said she was at Hong Lim Park to oversee the Proms at the Park event and greet the guest-of-honour, Minister of State Teo Ser Luck.


"When guest-of-honour Teo Ser Luck arrived at 4.45pm, a prearranged time, the other group became more vocal and emotional at that point. The noise level from the group got louder and louder. They started to become a little bit more active, more busy, beyond the mound area" where they had previously congregated, the court heard.

She said that at that point, the protesters turned up the volume on their loudspeakers until those on the YMCA stage could not hear their own music.


"I wasn't really paying attention to what they were saying but the main message was 'Return our CPF'. They went around the main YMCA tent I would say four times, at a minimum," said Ms Seah.

She told Judge Chay Yuan Fatt that there were 17 charities participating in the event, and it involved elderly as well as very young participants. In a video played by the prosecution lawyers, Ms Seah pointed out where these groups were seated in relation to the stage as well as the group of protesters, which included Mr Roy Ngerng.

"The whole objective of this event was to allow sponsors to interact with the beneficiaries. The opportunity to bond was affected because of this other group," said Ms Seah, whose job was to manage outreach programmes at YMCA. She was questioned by Deputy Public Prosecutors John Lu, Amanda Chong, Francis Ng and Jane Lim.

She said she believed an autistic child had a "breakdown", and had to be moved to a quieter part of the park. Children with autism like things in a very structured manner, and one who is disturbed will sit covering his or her ears and rocking back and forth, Ms Seah said, demonstrating the movement. "We had to move the child because of safety issues."





The YMCA executive added that the protests affected the event in other ways. For example, one of the placards that was waved by the protesters may have hit a representative of one of the beneficiary charities, said Ms Seah.

Mr Teo also had to be moved in a different direction from originally planned, and could not interact with the sponsors, while YMCA was unable to serve food to beneficiaries, she added.

For disrupting the YMCA event and causing a public nuisance, each of the accused can be ordered to pay a fine of up to S$1,000. For organising a demonstration without prior approval, Han could be ordered to pay a fine of up to S$5,000.

Two more co-accused, Roy Ngerng, 34, and Chua Siew Leng, 43, have previously pleaded guilty and have been ordered to pay fines of S$1,900 and S$300, respectively.


Source: CNA http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/hong-lim-park-protests/2192320.html

Day 1 CNA report here: http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/han-hui-hui-and-3-others/2187202.html



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Additional updates to Day 2

Protesters accuse YMCA of provoking them

Defendant blames NParks for not informing organisers of concurrent event held in the same area

By Kelly Ng, TODAY
Published: 10:21 PM, October 15, 2015
Updated: 11:01 PM, October 15, 2015

SINGAPORE — Tempers flared in a courtroom today (Oct 15) when four #ReturnOurCPF protesters facing public nuisance charges lobbed accusations and blame at prosecution witnesses.

While cross-examining an emcee of the YMCA charity event that happened concurrently with the protest at Hong Lim Park in September last year, Koh Yew Beng, one of the defendants, charged today that the protesters had been taunted.

When Mr Abraham Ho, a YMCA employee and one of the emcees that day, denied on the stand that he had said “We love CPF” into the microphone while the protest was going on, Koh shouted: “You’re a liar!”

Koh, 60, along with blogger Han Hui Hui, 24, Goh Aik Huat, 42, and Low Wai Choo, 50, are contesting charges of causing public nuisance on Sept 27 last year by disrupting YMCA’s annual Proms at the Park carnival.

Han faces an additional charge of organising a demonstration without approval. All four are conducting their own defence.

Today, National Parks Board (NParks) manager Sim Bee Lan testified that YMCA’s application to use Hong Lim Park for their event was approved on Sept 9 last year. The event involved beneficiaries such as individuals with special needs, youths at risk and the elderly.

Ms Sim also told the court that NParks approved six applications to deliver speeches at Hong Lim Park in relation to the Central Provident Fund system.

Two of these applications were made by the defendants in this case, between Sept 22 and Sept 26.

The court heard that Ms Sim informed the YMCA event’s organisers through a phone call that the speeches would happen concurrently with their carnival. Ms Sim testified that she did not manage to reach Han to inform her of the same.

Asked by Low why she did not attempt to contact the other five speech applicants, of which Low was one, Ms Sim said she had learnt from one of the application forms that Han was the one who organised the event.

“You can’t get (Han) but there are six people. Why didn’t you call the others? I was shocked when I saw YMCA there. Don’t you think you have a responsibility to tell me too?” Low asked.

In response, Ms Sim said the Speakers’ Corner is a shared space where multiple events can take place at one time. “Previously, other events (were held concurrently) and participants were quite accommodating to one another,” she said.

At this point, Low began to raise her voice, challenging the witness that it was “common sense” that a protest should not be held together with an event involving individuals with special needs.

“Is it fair to me that because of your negligence in calling us ... we were not aware of another event held there, and now I am being charged as a criminal? I am very angry and upset,” said Low, breaking down in tears.

District Judge Chay Yuen Fatt stepped in at this point and said it was not Ms Sim’s place to respond to the question posed by Low.

The trial enters its last day tomorrow (16 Oct).


Source: TODAY, http://www.todayonline.com/singapore/protesters-accuse-ymca-provoking-them?singlepage=true

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Additional Notes

Janet Low Wai Choo, 55
GE2015 People's Power Party Candidate for Chua Chu Kang GRC
Received 23.11% votes, vs PAP

Han Hui Hui, 24
GE2015 Independent candidate for Radin Mas SMC
Received 10.04% votes – deposit forfeited, vs RP & PAP


Related Links
14minute video of NParks and Police Officers approaching ReturnMyCPF Protestors


17-minute, uncut video shows Roy Ngerng & ReturnMyCPF protesters encroaching on YMCA’s venue


Photo gallery of the Protest


The Sunday Times (Print copy): Chaos at Hong Lim park charity carnival http://www.gov.sg/~/media/gov/files/media/20140928-st-chaos_at_hong_lim_park_charity_carnival0f1c.pdf








Wednesday, October 14, 2015

Han Hui Hui's Public Nuisance Trial (Day 1) - Still delusional

(Day 1 of Trial)


Here are some rather alarming and self-serving remarks from Han Hui Hui at her trial.

Extracted from Yahoo News:


Video screened to the court showed Han and Ngerng leading a group of people towards the YMCA event. The group was chanting slogans, beating drums, and blowing whistles.

The performance by the Y-Stars, who are made up of special needs individuals, had to be stopped and restarted because the performers could not hear the start of the music, the court was told.

The witness, whose son was also performing as part of the Y-Stars, said those with special needs were easily frightened by loud noises.



She also told the court that performances such as the one at Hong Lim Park were important events not just for the performers, but also their parents and caregivers.

When asked by Han why she had allowed her son to perform during a protest, the witness told the court she had believed Han’s group would have stopped for the performers to carry out their routine.


Han, who was representing herself, also asked the witness if she had wondered if the performer crying after a year was because “she realised she was being made use of by the PAP government”, to which the witness replied "No."

Another witness, whose daughter also took part at the YMCA event, said the Y-Stars performers were very quiet after the incident that day, when they were usually “very happy” following a routine.

When Han asked her if she thought the YMCA did a good job with the event, the witness compared it to a wedding where someone brought a coffin around.

“Would you be happy?” the witness replied.



+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Sources

SG Yahoo News : Special needs performer still traumatised a year after Hong Lim Park incident


Channel News Asia: Han Hui Hui and 3 others go on trial over Hong Lim Park protest
http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/han-hui-hui-and-3-others/2187202.html


Image: Singapore Matters



Additional Note

Han Hui Hui, 24, GE2015 Independent candidate for Radin Mas SMC
Received 10.04% votes – deposit forfeited, vs RP & PAP


Related Links

14minute video of NParks and Police Officers approaching ReturnMyCPF Protestors


17-minute, uncut video shows Roy Ngerng & ReturnMyCPF protesters encroaching on YMCA’s venue


Photo gallery of the Protest


The Sunday Times (Print copy): Chaos at Hong Lim park charity carnival http://www.gov.sg/~/media/gov/files/media/20140928-st-chaos_at_hong_lim_park_charity_carnival0f1c.pdf






Tuesday, October 13, 2015

Han Hui Hui and 3 others go on trial over Hong Lim Park protest

Blogger Han Hui Hui, 24, and three co-accused are facing public nuisance charges for disrupting a community event held at Hong Lim Park in September last year. Han is facing an additional charge of organizing the demonstration without approval. 



By Vanessa Paige Chelvan
POSTED: 13 Oct 2015 07:00 UPDATED: 13 Oct 2015 18:02

SINGAPORE: The trial of blogger Han Hui Hui, 24, and three co-accused began on Tuesday (Oct 13) at the State Courts. The quartet are facing public nuisance charges for disrupting a community event held at Hong Lim Park in September last year, by shouting loudly, chanting slogans, waving flags, holding placards, blowing whistles and beating drums, the court heard.

Han is facing an additional charge of organising the demonstration without approval. Two more co-accused, Roy Ngerng, 34, and Chua Siew Leng, 43, have previously pleaded guilty and have been ordered to pay fines of S$1,900 and S$300, respectively.

District Judge Chay Yuan Fatt is presiding over the trial, which is scheduled over four days until Friday. The four accused are unrepresented, and will be conducting their own defence.

Han, together with fellow blogger Ngerng and their co-accused, held their #ReturnOurCPF protest rally at the same time and place as the YMCA Proms @ The Park 2014 charity carnival held on Sep 27, 2014.

Han’s group had made a successful application to the Commissioner of Parks and Recreation through the NParks website for approval to give a speech at Speakers’ Corner, located within Hong Lim Park.

Han, posting on the #ReturnOurCPF – Jobs Facebook page, said that according to NParks, “it’s very common to have two or more events happening on the same day”. She went on to add that “we are all Singaporeans at the end of the day. Let’s educate them on the root cause of the problem and let us shout in unity when Teo Ser Luck comes”. She added: “Bring placards and whistles!”

On Sep 27, NParks officers spotted Han and her co-accused - Ngerng, Low Wai Choo, 54, Goh Aik Huat, 41, and Koh Yew Beng, 59 - gathering next to the registration point of the YMCA event.

The officers advised them to use an adjoining lawn of the park which was not occupied by the YMCA event, but the group refused.

When then-Minister of State for Trade and Industry Teo Ser Luck – the guest-of-honour for the YMCA event – arrived at the park, the attendees of Han’s protest became more emotive.

Han then suggested to Ngerng that the group “walk one round”. The two then led their co-accused and a group of at least 20 other people in a march towards the YMCA event.

The group demonstrated by shouting loudly, chanting slogans, waving flags, holding placards, blowing whistles loudly and beating drums, the court heard.

DOWN'S SYNDROME CHILDREN 'VISIBLY AFFECTED'

The prosecution on Tuesday called the first four out of the 14 witnesses expected to testify. Two were mothers of children with Down’s Syndrome whose dance performance at the YMCA event had been disrupted by the protest, the court heard.

The Down’s Syndrome children whose mothers testified were part of a group called Y-Stars, who were invited to perform a dance routine at the YMCA event. The court heard that the Y-Stars’ performance was disrupted due to the commotion the protest was causing – loud, shrill noises scare Down’s Syndrome sufferers, who are sensitive to loud and sudden noises, the mothers said.

“They could have stopped for three minutes for them (the Y-Stars) to perform”, said one witness. “These are not normal children. They are Down’s Syndrome children”, the second mother said. The children were visibly affected by the disruption, as they were not smiling like usual after the performance, the mothers said.

LIKE 'BRINGING A COFFIN TO A WEDDING'

In cross-examining the prosecution’s witnesses, Judge Chay had to intervene several times to stop Han from pursuing an irrelevant line of questioning and repeating questions several times, which was frustrating witnesses and causing tensions to rise.

In one instance, Han asked a witness: “Do you think YMCA did a good job in the event?” The witness replied, “it’s just like a wedding function and someone brings a coffin around. Do you think you will be happy?”

For disrupting the YMCA event and causing a public nuisance, each of the accused can be ordered to pay a fine of up to S$1,000.

For organising a demonstration without prior approval, Han could be ordered to pay a fine of up to S$5,000.

The trial continues.

- CNA/vc

Source: CNA http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/han-hui-hui-and-3-others/2187202.html


=============================================

Additional Notes

Roy Ngerng Yi Ling, 34,
GE2015 Reform Party Candidate for Ang Mo Kio GRC
Received 21.6% votes, vs PAP

Han Hui Hui, 24,
GE2015 Independent candidate for Radin Mas SMC
Received 10.04% votes – deposit forfeited, vs RP & PAP

Janet Low Wai Choo, 55
GE2015 People's Power Party Candidate for Chua Chu Kang GRC
Received 23.11% votes, vs PAP


Related Links

14minute video of NParks and Police Officers approaching ReturnMyCPF Protestors


17-minute, uncut video shows Roy Ngerng & ReturnMyCPF protesters encroaching on YMCA’s venue


Online reactions to Hong Lim Park rallygoers’ heckling of special needs children at charity carnival


Mr Brown: On the #ReturnMyCPF Protesters disrupting the YMCA event


Hong Lim Park fracas: When protests cross the line




Monday, October 12, 2015

Timeline of the Roy Ngerng saga


by Sharmeel Sidhu

May 15 2014
A blog post is published by Roy Ngerng titled “Where Your CPF Money is Going: Learning from the City Harvest Trial”, where he uses charts to compare the roles of the leaders of City Harvest, with a similar one of PM Lee and various other figures.

May 18 2014
Ngerng is served a Letter of Demand by PM Lee Hsien Loong’s lawyers. Ngerng announces that he has been sued. Ngerng implied that PM Lee, as Chairman of GIC, is “guilty of criminal misappropriation of the monies paid by Singaporeans to the CPF.”

May 20 2014
Ngerng takes down the post from his blog, but stalled on his apology. He continues to publish blog posts on the CPF scheme (“YOUR CPF: The Complete Truth and Nothing But The Truth”). He also asks his supporters to sign an online petition (1,593 supporters as of 24 May,9am) and join the Facebook event page (508 fans attending, as of 24 May,9am) to ask the government to return Singaporeans’ CPF.

May 21 2014
Ngerng applies to be an NMP, and shares the issues (labour, income inequality and poverty, CPF, healthcare and education) he would advocate as an NMP. He is granted a deadline extension until 23 May, 5pm to comply with the demands from PM Lee’s lawyer. Human rights group Maruah and Singapore Democratic Party Sec-Gen Chee Soon Juan speak up against PM Lee’s move.




May 23 2014
Ngerng publishes an apology on his blog and acknowledges that his comments about PM Lee is “false and completely without foundation”. Three days later PM Lee’s lawyers say that his apology was not genuine and “demanded that he remove four further blog posts and a YouTube video, or face aggravated damages”. Ngerng agrees to delete these articles. On May 27, Ngerng’s offer of $5,000 in damages is rejected by PM Lee’s lawyers.

May 26 2014
Davinder Singh, PM Lee’s lawyer, says that Ngerng “misled” PM Lee, and the public by not removing the Youtube video like he’d agreed to do, and only made it private. He accuses Ngerng of sending two emails consisting of links to the video and post to the media; Ngerng’s lawyer M Ravi said that he was not aware of this.

29 May 2014
PM Lee files a defamation suit; Ng raises money for his case on “crowdfunding” site; roughly $110,000 was raised from over a thousand contributions.

17 June 2014
Ngerng’s lawyer M Ravi states his defence; says his client did not imply that PM Lee misappropriated CPF funds.

July 2014
PM Lee applies for summary judgement; Ngerng follows up on 4th August with an affidavit stating that he was questioning the distribution of CPF monies. PM Lee responds, saying that his claims are “inadmissible, irrelevant and/or an abuse of the process of the court”.

19 September 2014
During a closed hearing, PM Lee’s team asks for an injunction, saying that Mr Ngerng has no defence, after Ngerng said that his post was misinterpreted; he also stated that the Defamation Act did not prevent his freedom of speech. Ngerng’s lawyer defends his client, saying that the blog post in question was not defamatory on the whole.





Sep 27 2014
“Heckle-gate” – Ngerng, together with Han Hui Hui, leads a protest at Hong Lim Park called “Return Our CPF”. They interrupt a YMCA event, “holding placards and shouting slogans, and disrupting the performance and frightening participants including special needs children who were performing at the charity event”

7 November 2014
The High court of Singapore finds Ngerng guilty of defamation with damages to be assessed, the first such ruling in Singapore over an online article. An injunction against Ngerng is granted, barring him from posting further accusations. Ngerng maintains that he will continue speaking about CPF and other concerns that Singaporeans have.

12 Jan 2015
 Ngerng ordered to pay PM Lee $29,000 in legal fees and other expenses; Ngerng pays on 6 Feb after argument with lawyer.



M. Ravi accuses Roy of swindling the donated money
(Mothership: http://mothership.sg/2015/02/has-lawyer-m-ravi-had-enough-of-his-client-cpf-blogger-roy-ngerngs-antics/)

6 Feb 2015
A video of M Ravi is released online, showing him outside the Subordinate Courts expressing his distress at client Ngerng, after he failed to show up for his application to leave Singapore’s jurisdiction to go to Norway.M Ravi was diagnosed with Bipolar Disorder in 2006.

10 Feb 2015
Ngerng’s lawyer M Ravi barred from practice by The Law Society until further examination by a psychiatrist; this decision is made after a medical examination.

11 Feb 2015
M Ravi goes to The Law Society’s office to appeal his ban, and his visit is documented in a absurd 12- minute long Youtube video. Ravi says that his suspension is due to his decision to take part in the election.

1-3 July 2015
Ngerng to go to Supreme Court without a counsel to assess damages he must pay PM Lee, after being found guilty of defamation.

Source: http://themiddleground.sg/2015/07/01/roy-timeline/

===============================

Addition References & Reports

Confrontation by ReturnMyCPF Protestors
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2w1hYRVyclo

Uncut 17-minute video indeed shows CPF blogger Roy Ngerng encroaching on YMCA’s venue
http://mothership.sg/2014/10/uncut-17-minute-video-indeed-shows-cpf-blogger-roy-ngerng-encroaching-on-ymcas-venue/

Online reactions to Hong Lim Park rallygoers’ heckling of special needs children at charity carnival
http://mothership.sg/2014/09/online-reactions-to-hong-lim-park-rallygoers-heckling-of-special-needs-children-at-charity-carnival/

Mr Brown: On the #ReturnMyCPF Protesters disrupting the YMCA event
http://www.mrbrown.com/blog/2014/09/on-the-returnmycpf-protestors-ymca-incident.html

Hong Lim Park fracas: When protests cross the line - See more at: http://ifonlysingaporeans.blogspot.sg/2014/10/hong-lim-park-fracas-when-protests.html#sthash.1al1MmRw.dpuf

Timeline of the Roy Ngerng saga
http://themiddleground.sg/2015/07/01/roy-timeline/




Roy Ngerng pleads guilty to disrupting YMCA event, fined S$1,900

The Judge singled blogger Roy Ngerng, 33, out as the leader of a group that caused a public nuisance at Hong Lim Park. He also pleaded guilty to organising a demonstration without approval.


By Vanessa Paige Chelvan  POSTED: 07 Oct 2015 11:12  UPDATED: 07 Oct 2015 23:29

SINGAPORE: Blogger Roy Ngerng, 33, pleaded guilty to charges of public nuisance and organising a demonstration without approval, on Wednesday (Oct 7). He was fined S$1,900.

Both offences were committed at Hong Lim Park on Sep 27, 2014, where the YMCA was holding a charity carnival, YMCA Proms @ The Park 2014.




Ngerng, together with fellow blogger Han Hui Hui, 24, and four others, held their #ReturnOurCPF protest rally at the same time and place as the YMCA event. The group had made a successful application to the Commissioner of Parks and Recreation through the NParks website for approval to give a “speech” at Speakers’ Corner, located within Hong Lim Park.



Han, posting on the #ReturnOurCPF – Jobs Facebook page, said that according to NParks, “it’s very common to have two or more events happening on the same day”. She went on to add that “we are all Singaporeans at the end of the day. Let’s educate them the root cause of the problem and let us shout in unity when Teo Ser Luck comes”. She added: “Bring placards and whistles!”

On Sep 27, NParks officers spotted Ngerng and his co-accused - Han, Low Wai Choo, 54, Goh Aik Huat, 41, and Koh Yew Beng, 59 - gathering next to the registration point of the YMCA event.

The officers advised them to use an adjoining lawn of the park which was not occupied by the YMCA event, but Ngerng and his co-accused refused.

When then-Minister of State for Trade and Industry Teo Ser Luck - the guest-of-honour for the YMCA event - arrived at the Park, the attendees of Ngerg’s protest became “more emotive”.

Han then suggested to Ngerng that the group “walk one round”. The two then led their co-accused and a group of at least 20 other people in a march towards the YMCA event.

The group demonstrated by shouting loudly, chanting slogans, waving flags, holding placards, blowing whistles loudly and beating drums, the court heard.

NGERNG "DEEPLY REMORSEFUL"

In court on Wednesday, Ngerng’s lawyer Eugene Thuraisingam said his client had contributed to society by volunteering his time to teach special needs and autistic children. He is also a “well-known advocate for matters of public interest”, Mr Thuraisingam said.

“His offence is ignorance”, said the lawyer, as Ngerng did not know that separate approval was required for a demonstration, after he had already obtained approval to hold an event at the Park.

Ngerng holds a “genuine belief” that he was speaking on matters of public interest, and is “deeply remorseful he did not do this in accordance with the law”, the lawyer said.

“He will not reoffend”, Mr Thuraisingam added, in seeking a fine of S$1,900.

Deputy Public Prosecutor John Lu agreed that a fine of that amount would be “appropriate”.

In ordering Ngerng to pay the fine, District Judge Liew Thaim Leng singled Ngerng out as the “leader of the group”, and said that the demonstration had “caused disruption to other events in the vicinity”. The Judge reiterated that the permit was granted for a specific purpose, and the demonstration was not covered by the permit.



Ngerng’s co-accused are expected to go on trial on Oct 12. Han is facing charges of public nuisance and organising a demonstration without approval, while Low, Goh and Koh each face a charge of public nuisance.

Another co-accused, Chua Siew Leng, had pleaded guilty in March this year. She was fined S$300 for causing a public nuisance.

- CNA/wl/vc

Source: CNA http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/roy-ngerng-pleads-guilty/2175122.html?cid=fbsg



This is the full 17-minute, uncut video recording of what happened at Hong Lim Park on 27 Sept 2014.





Additional Note

Roy Ngerng Yi Ling, 34, GE2015 Reform Party Candidate for Ang Mo Kio GRC
Received 21.6% votes, vs PAP


Related Links

14minute video of NParks and Police Officers approaching ReturnMyCPF Protestors


17-minute, uncut video shows Roy Ngerng & ReturnMyCPF protesters encroaching on YMCA’s venue


Online reactions to Hong Lim Park rallygoers’ heckling of special needs children at charity carnival


Mr Brown: On the #ReturnMyCPF Protesters disrupting the YMCA event