Monday, October 17, 2016

Singapore's foreign policy in a changing world

Six countries in three months: the United States, China, Laos, Japan, India and Australia. PM Lee has been making the rounds to affirm strong ties and boost them further. Insight looks at these visits to Singapore's key partners and the challenges for Singapore's approach to foreign policy at a time when the global balance of power is shifting. PIC: Singapore Matters


Singapore's foreign policy in a changing world

By Chong Zi Liang, Straits Times, Published Oct 16, 2016, 5:00 am SGT

The past three months have been packed ones for Singapore's diplomats.

From Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong's visit to Washington in August to his address to Australia's Parliament in Canberra last week, Singapore has been stepping up ties with its key partners.

In between those two trips, PM Lee was invited to the Group of 20 leaders' summit in Hangzhou, China, and visited Vientiane in Laos, as well as Tokyo and New Delhi.

These visits underscore the importance of diplomacy to Singapore's survival and sovereignty as a small state that relies on open trade and respect for the rule of law globally.

But Singapore's independent, principled, foreign policy positions have also come under scrutiny as the global balance of power shifts.

Insight looks at Singapore's foreign policy and the challenges it faces on the international as well as domestic front.

A small country like Singapore needs all the friends it can get, and Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has flown some 70,000km over the past three months to make sure of that.

In August, he made an official visit to the United States at the invitation of President Barack Obama, a significant gesture that reflected a warm, deep and wide-ranging friendship spanning cooperation in various fields over the past 50 years.

Last month, he visited China for the Group of 20 leaders' summit at the invitation of President Xi Jinping, and both leaders took stock of the broad and growing friendship, in particular the third government-to-government project in Chongqing.

PM Lee then went on to Laos for the annual Asean and East Asia summits involving leaders of all 10 South-east Asian countries and their key partners to take regional partnerships forward.

Later that month, he also visited Japan, met Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and witnessed the signing of several pacts to strengthen ties in trade, infrastructure and technology.

In the first week of this month, he made a trip to India where he met Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and witnessed the signing of several pacts to strengthen cooperation in intellectual property and skills training.


TAKING THE WORLD AS IT IS
Singapore has to take the world as it is; it is too small to change it. But we can try to maximise the space we have to manoeuvre among the big 'trees' in the region. That has been our approach and we will have to be nimble and resourceful to be able to continue doing so.FORMER PRIME MINISTER LEE KUAN YEW, in his 2013 book One Man's View Of The World.


Last week, PM Lee was in Australia where he met Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, witnessed the inking of pacts to step up defence, trade, innovation and security ties, and made a historic speech to its Parliament, the first Singapore prime minister to do so.

As he said in a Twitter post yesterday on his visit: "We've signed several agreements with Australia to take our relationship further. Happy to call them 'mates'."

In Canberra, he told Singapore reporters there are still a few more trips to come. This year saw more trips than the year before, when the calendar included SG50 celebrations and the general election.

But opportunities also presented themselves, such as the one-year anniversary of the strategic partnership with India and the conclusion of a package of initiatives under the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership with Australia, he said.

"While we must not lose sight of our own domestic problems, neither must we forget that there's an outside world. There are things happening that affect us, there are opportunities and friends we have to pay attention to," PM Lee added.

The need to build upon these friendships was a key theme in his National Day Rally speech in August, where he said it was important for Singapore to have a network of friends, in its neighbourhood as well as among big powers.

The US presence in this region has fostered peace and stability and enabled countries to grow, and China's stability and prosperity have greatly benefited Asia and the world, he said then.

"We are friends with both America and China. It is easiest to do this if the two countries are on good terms with each other. In fact, both countries do aim to be on good terms with each other," he added.

"Both believe the Pacific is vast enough to accommodate both powers and President Xi Jinping said recently that America and China should 'cultivate common circles of friends'. That is precisely what Singapore is trying to do - to be among America's circle of friends, and also among China's circle of friends."


SURVIVING RAPIDS IN A CANOE 
Running the United States is like being in command of an aircraft carrier. You will not capsize. Steering a small and young country is more like shooting rapids in a canoe. 
We are at the mercy of the external elements - the velocity of world trade expansion, the economic rocks, and the international political turns and twists. We need the best skills to survive the rapids. 
EMERITUS SENIOR MINISTER GOH CHOK TONG, in a 1985 speech at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy in Massachusetts, United States. Mr Goh was then first deputy prime minister and defence minister.


These friendships are not just about geopolitics, but economics too. Singapore has significant trade accounts with the US, China, Japan, India and Australia, and in its key partnerships, both sides have sought to advance common interests and mutual benefits.

KEY MESSAGES

On his visit to Washington, PM Lee made the point that America's staying open to trade with the region and its presence in the Asia-Pacific have helped create the basis for a peaceful, rules-based order, and he expressed the hope the US would stay engaged in this region.

In an interview with Chinese magazine Caijing in Hangzhou, he said that countries in the region should also determine their own path and not be divided by big powers.

"Countries in Asia, Singapore, certainly, but many other countries too, are good friends to both China and America and we would like to be good friends with both.

"And this is easiest if both China and America are working well with each other," he said.

He also said: "If Asean is split and South-east Asia becomes a region where different powers contend with each other and try to jockey and gain advantage and play one country against another, it will raise tensions in the region...

"It will not be to the advantage of the powers either, because it would mean a less stable Asia."

These remarks echo positions that have been consistently held by Singapore's top diplomats, who say they remain ever more crucial as the global balance of power shifts and relations between the US and China become more interlinked, but also more competitive.

Singapore's interests are best served by all players taking an active role in upholding peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific.

A key message PM Lee had for his friends in Tokyo, New Delhi and Canberra respectively was that a Japan, India and Australia that remain active and engaged in the region - trading more with it and taking part in maintaining its security - was good for the region overall.

As he told a special session of the Nikkei International Conference on the future of Asia in Tokyo: "All sides have a vested interest in reaching a new and workable balance, and in minimising conflict.

"For if countries fail to work together, we are not just losing opportunities to prosper together, but are also putting at serious risk all that we have achieved so far."


CERTAIN OF SINGAPORE'S PLACE 
Singapore is a small country, but we do not drift aimlessly. We are not a piece of flotsam. We have a definite place in the world, and a definite view of life, and of what is right and wrong. 
Whether it is 1985 or 1995, I expect that we will be guided by the same basic philosophy that every country, big or small, has a right to be itself. It has a right to live, a right to its own way of life. 
From this philosophy springs our foreign policy and our defence policy. We will be friends with anyone who wishes to be friends with us. We are not, and will not, be aligned with any bloc, though our ties are closer with the West than with the Communist bloc of countries. 
MR GOH, in the same 1985 speech.


But a more challenging environment ahead, observers say, also makes it important for Singaporeans to be aware of the key elements of their country's foreign policy.

SINGAPORE'S FOREIGN POLICY AIM

The overriding objective of Singapore's foreign policy is similar to why the country sets great store by defence and a strong, credible Singapore Armed Forces: to ensure Singapore's survival and sovereignty as an independent nation.

The country often describes its own foreign policy as principled.

Beyond building ties with partners, it seeks to foster common interests among friendly nations so as to uphold a stable, secure region and a global order that abides by the rule of law.

Singapore diplomats and observers say these principles are few but fundamental. They include:

  • Upholding international law and supporting a rules-based international order
  • Staying committed to an open economy that depends on freedom of navigation in international maritime and air space
  • Seeking peaceful resolution to disputes
  • Being a reliable partner who respects treaties and contracts
  • Adopting a realistic worldview while remembering that Singapore is a price-taker and not a price-setter in international affairs

Adherence to these principles is not just about doing the right thing. It is a matter of survival, they add.

As Professor Chan Heng Chee, a veteran diplomat, says: "As a small country, these principles are our best defence and win us respect.

"It is important to retain them because our actions are then consistent and based on reason. They are important for our self-preservation. Other countries see us as reliable and constant."

These guidelines have served Singapore well over the last 50 years.


UPHOLD INTERNATIONAL LAW 
Upholding international law and the peaceful settlement of disputes is a vital interest for a small country like Singapore. When we have disputes with other countries, that is how we settle them. 
In reality, big powers do not always act like that. Big powers can insist on their own interests and often do. They do not submit to adjudication by international tribunals, they may not comply with their rulings... 
Nevertheless, Singapore must support and strive for a rules-based international order. We have to depend on words and treaties. They mean everything to us. We cannot afford to have international relations work on the basis that might is right. If rules do not matter, then small countries like Singapore have no chance of survival. 
PM LEE HSIEN LOONG, in his 2016 National Day Rally.


Singapore was one of the five founding members of Asean in 1967, set up at the height of the Cold War to prevent larger outside powers from dominating the region.

Asean has fostered peace and stability in the region and created a climate where the ties that bind its various members individually and as a group are stronger than the disagreements they may have from time to time. And Singapore has reiterated the need for the grouping to be united and in control of events in its region, even as its unity has been tested on occasion.

Today, one foreign policy challenge that makes the headlines is territorial disputes in the South China Sea involving four Asean members. Singapore is not a claimant state, but the significance of the issue and Singapore's position on it prompted PM Lee to address it in his National Day Rally speech.

He reiterated Singapore's stance on respect for international law, freedom of navigation and the need for a united Asean. He also said Singapore took no sides on the overlapping territorial claims and was simply sticking to its own principled, consistent stance.

CHALLENGES AHEAD


In his rally speech, PM Lee noted that "life is never so straightforward" as Singapore has had issues with its friends from time to time. Also, the interests of its friends will sometimes conflict, and Singapore will be pressured to choose sides.

Singapore has all along maintained its right to determine its own course of action and advance its people's interests, standing its ground in the face of pressure from friends. In 1994, American teenager Michael Fay was caned for vandalism, despite pressure from US officials to drop the punishment.

Singapore has also had periodic run-ins with Jakarta officials over the issue of transboundary haze emanating from fires in Indonesia.

"It's not because we love confrontation. We just stand our ground because we are a small country and need to hold on to certain principles," says senior fellow William Choong of the International Institute for Strategic Studies-Asia.


NEED TO TAKE A PRINCIPLED STAND 
On the South China Sea, we have got our own stand, principled, consistent; different from China's, different from the Philippines or America. Other countries will persuade us to side with them, and we have to choose our own place to stand, what is in our interest, calculate it, choose the spot, stand firm. 
I tell you this so that you will understand why we have to stand up for Singapore's position. Sometimes, if you read the foreign media, including the PRC media, you will find articles criticising Singapore for not siding more with them... Some Singaporeans are concerned because they have PRC friends, business partners, academic colleagues, personal contacts. They may tell you any tension between Singapore and China will affect your business, affect your collaboration. 
I understand these concerns. We would like business and collaboration to continue too. If they are disrupted, both sides lose. 
But the Government has to take a national point of view, decide what is in Singapore's overall interests. We want good relations with other countries... but we must also be prepared for ups and downs from time to time. 
Singapore has a reputation to protect, that we have our own independent, carefully-thought-out stand. We cooperate with other countries but we make our own calculations, and that is what makes us credible, consistent, reliable, valuable to others, to Asean partners, to the powers - America, China, Europe. It has taken us a long time to build up this reputation and we have to be very careful to maintain it. 
PM LEE, at his 2016 National Day Rally.


Last month, Chinese state-linked newspaper Global Times accused Singapore of pushing to include an international tribunal's ruling on the South China Sea - that dismissed China's territorial claims there - in the final document of the Non-Aligned Movement summit.

The article sparked a war of words with Singapore's Ambassador to China Stanley Loh, who disputed the paper's account and said there was a common, united Asean position to update the document.

Despite the clarification, there was some public backlash against Singapore in China.

The incident was seen as a move by some to sway Singapore's position on the subject. It was also seen as an example of increasingly complex challenges Singapore faces as the global balance of power shifts.

In such a new and evolving global order, can Singapore's longstanding foreign policy - to be friends with all sides and take no sides - continue to be effective?

Shortly after the Global Times saga began, some commentators were quick to declare that China had embarked on a more coercive approach towards Singapore.

But outspoken career diplomat Bilahari Kausikan thinks Beijing had begun being more assertive earlier. He sees the Global Times episode as "being played out loudly in public as part of an ongoing attempt to bypass the Government and influence policy by making Singaporeans jittery".

"To understand the game is the first step in not being forced to play it," Mr Kausikan added.

Indeed, Mr Lee acknowledged in his National Day Rally speech that some Singaporeans with business and other professional partners in China are worried that any tension will hurt their dealings there.

"We want good relations with other countries if it is at all possible, but we must also be prepared for ups and downs from time to time," he said, adding that the Government had to take a national point of view and defend Singapore's overall interests.

Besides, the country's ties with China go beyond the South China Sea issue and are underpinned by decades of relations and collaboration on major projects, he added.


NOT LASHED TO ANY ONE MAST
We don't lash ourselves to the mast of any power but all the ones that matter. We play nice to China, but also to the US, EU, Japan as well. 
Our foreign policy is multi-directional, we're not part of any exclusive alliance. We're not a formal ally of US, we've never gone down that route. In a decade where China's power is ascendant and US power somewhat shaky, this is still a good position to take going forward. 
DR WILLIAM CHOONG, Shangri-La Dialogue senior fellow for Asia-Pacific Security, International Institute for Strategic Studies.


MP Vikram Nair, who chairs the Government Parliamentary Committee for defence and foreign affairs, says some businessmen have expressed concern about the situation. But they understand why the Government was adopting such a stance on the issue, he says.

"Both sides are practical and there are many things we are working on together," Mr Nair adds.

REPUTATION TO PROTECT


Observers say Singapore is respected as a voice of reason abroad, thanks to its reputation of consistency and trustworthiness.

Its stature was built by decades of active participation in international bodies such as the United Nations, and by leading efforts such as starting the Forum of Small States, for nations with populations below 10 million, in 1992.

Because Singapore is not beholden to any country for aid, it is able to speak its mind and take positions of principle. As Dr Choong says: "Singapore punches above its weight in the diplomatic space."

Singapore's diplomacy has also come under the spotlight as it is country coordinator for Asean-China Dialogue relations till mid-2018.

Many in China believe that Singapore, with its large ethnic Chinese community, is a Chinese society that should understand and support Chinese interests.

"China expects special treatment of Chinese sensitivities and interests. There are no two ways about this," says S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies executive deputy chairman Ong Keng Yong, a veteran diplomat.

Such fundamental mismatches in the characterisation of bilateral relations are not new to Singapore.


PM'S VISITS PLAY VITAL ROLE 
PM Lee's visits to the US, India, China, Japan and Australia are part and parcel of Singapore's regular efforts to maintain its international profile and close relations with key foreign partners. The timing of visits depends on the host country's convenience. 
It is important to bear in mind that Singapore's economy depends on these countries' economic health and the PM must continue to stay in close touch with their political and business leaders. 
AMBASSADOR ONG KENG YONG, executive deputy chairman of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies.


For instance, some in Indonesia and Malaysia hold an abang-adik attitude towards the island state, treating ties as that between an older and younger brother.

But it does mean Singapore diplomats are confronted from time to time by casual remarks from Chinese counterparts on Singapore's Chinese-ness. The Singaporeans then politely but firmly remind them that Singapore is a sovereign, multiracial country, with English as its working language.

Likewise, Singapore's actions or positions in strengthening ties with other partners are not directed at any country. As PM Lee said in Canberra, the Singapore-Australia partnership is part of a network of relationships that is about strengthening regional stability, by building "an open and inclusive regional security architecture".

Key to such an architecture are basics Singapore has called for - a commitment to international law and a rules-based global order.

It also entails seeking new friendships and reinforcing old ones.

The travel PM Lee has chalked up on behalf of the country goes a long way in maintaining Singapore's international standing and relevance to its partners, says Mr Ong.

"Some of my friends living and working overseas stress to me the significance of PM Lee visiting the countries where they are in," he says. "They reminded me Singapore faces stiff competition from other countries with cheaper things to sell and more talented expertise to share. Without PM Lee's high-profile foreign visits, the goodwill and opportunities for Singapore cannot be fully tapped."


PM LEE'S TRIPS IN PAST THREE MONTHS


JULY 31-AUG 5: UNITED STATES

PM met President Barack Obama and was hosted to a state dinner at the White House. Mr Lee also spoke of the importance of the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade pact to America and the region.

AUG 25: INDONESIA (POSTPONED)

PM was to attend the Singapore-Indonesia Leaders' Retreat in Semarang and open the Kendal industrial park with President Joko Widodo. But he took ill at the National Day Rally and was given a week's medical leave. The retreat is scheduled to take place next month.

SEPT 2-5: CHINA

PM met President Xi Jinping and attended the G-20 summit in Hangzhou at Mr Xi's invitation. He also visited Chongqing for an update on the third Sino-Singapore joint project.

SEPT 6-8: LAOS

PM attended the Asean and East Asia summits. He also had introductory meetings with several regional leaders.

SEPT 26-29: JAPAN


PM was hosted to lunch by Emperor Akihito and met Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. He also delivered a speech at a special session of the Nikkei International Conference on the Future of Asia, where he spoke about China and Japan and the need for stability in the Asia-Pacific.

OCT 3-7: INDIA

PM met Prime Minister Narendra Modi and both leaders agreed to set up a committee to facilitate investments between both countries. They also agreed to expedite a review of an existing trade pact and expand cooperation in several areas. PM also visited Udaipur for the launch of a skills training institute.

OCT 11-13: AUSTRALIA

PM addressed the Australian Parliament in a speech that paid tribute to the deep, lasting ties and the shared strategic outlook and social ethos of both countries. He also witnessed the signing of agreements to deepen cooperation in defence, trade, innovation, law enforcement and the arts.


Source Article: Straits Times



Thursday, October 13, 2016

[Defending the Lion City] Singapore Navy launches third Littoral Mission Vessel

The Republic of Singapore Navy's third Littoral Mission Vessel, Unity, was launched at the Singapore Technologies Marine’s Benoi Yard. Photo: Republic Of Singapore Navy. 


TODAY, Published: 3:05 PM, October 13, 2016 Updated: 6:47 PM, October 13, 2016

SINGAPORE — The Republic of Singapore Navy’s (RSN) has launched its third Independence-class Littoral Mission Vessel (LMV), Unity.

Senior Minister of State for Defence Ong Ye Kung officiated at the launching ceremony at the Singapore Technologies Marine’s Benoi Yard on Thursday (Oct 13). His wife, Diana, launched the Unity.

Speaking at the ceremony, Mr Ong said the LMVs would form an important part of Singapore’s maritime force.

“The LMVs are far more capable and versatile, and will take the RSN into the future,” he said.

“The RSN, with its national maritime security partners, have been working together to keep a 24/7 watch over Singapore’s waters, to ensure the seaward defence of Singapore and protect the sea lines of communication that power our economy.”

Unity is the third of eight LMVs that will be built for the navy, under an agreement between the Defence Ministry and ST Engineering in 2013.

The LMVs are the Navy’s newest ships and will replace the Fearless-class Patrol Vessels, which have been in service for around 20 years.

Many innovations, as well as improvements in integration and design, enable the LMVs to deliver significantly enhanced capabilities compared to the Fearless-class patrol vessels.

For instance, the LMVs are designed with an integrated bridge, combat information centre and machinery control room that greatly enhances the crew’s shared awareness, and enables them to sense and react faster to maritime security threats.

The LMVs also require less manpower to operate: The eight LMVs will be able to do the work that previously required 11 current patrol vessels.

The 80m-long vessels were also designed to be operated and maintained with a lean crew of 23, compared to the Fearless-class ships which require 30.

They can also be quickly configured to take on a wide spectrum of operations, using non-lethal or lethal options — from a water cannon system to an Oto Melara 76/62 Super Rapid main gun to anti-air missiles — to deal with a range of maritime threats.

The first LMV, called Independence, was launched on July 3 last year; while the second LMV, Sovereignty, was launched on April 16 this year. Both vessels are presently undergoing sea trials.

The names of all eight LMVs — Independence, Sovereignty, Unity, Justice, Indomitable, Fortitude, Dauntless and Fearless — were chosen from those suggested by the public.

According to the Navy, the LMV Independence is expected to be fully operational by 2017, and all eight LMVs will be ready by 2020.


Article Source: TODAY 


Linked-In's Jeff Weiner praises Singapore for "skills and jobs"


Jeff Weiner is the CEO of the professional social networking company, Linked In. And this is a recent Tweet from him.




So what was Jeff referring to about skills and jobs?

In all likelihood, it was probably in reference to Singapore's SkillsFuture scheme.


SkillsFuture Singapore (SSG) is a statutory board under the Ministry of Education (MOE). It will drive and coordinate the implementation of the national SkillsFuture movement, promote a culture and holistic system of lifelong learning through the pursuit of skills mastery, and strengthen the ecosystem of quality education and training in Singapore.

SSG will strengthen the adult training infrastructure by taking on all existing functions of the Committee for Private Education (CPE) and the Institute for Adult Learning (IAL) to enhance the capabilities and professionalism of adult educators. SSG will play a key role in the quality assurance for private education institutions and adult training centres. Together with educational institutions and training partners, SSG will ensure that students and working adults have access to high quality, industry-relevant training throughout life. SSG will also bring together synergies in continuing education and training (CET) and pre-employment training (PET), so skills requirements will continue to meet the demands of different sectors of the economy.
Source: Skills Future Singapore website

Launched in 2015, the SkillsFuture scheme is a "national movement to harness the aspirations and talents of the population and encourage Singaporeans to keep on learning and upgrading their knowledge and skills."




If you had thought that the change in the job market that globalisation (remember that time when manufacturing jobs were being lost to China?) had brought about was huge, the next wave of change will be from the Digital Economy, and that's going to be even more disruptive.

While many jobs will be lost or made obsolete due to the use of the Internet, Technology and Automation, there will be just as many new jobs created that don't yet exist.

Think about it. We are already seeing signs of how Technology will change the jobs of the future.

We are already trialing an autonomous Taxis which do not need drivers. Some of our MRT lines are already driverless. And there are F&B businesses which are using robots to cook fried rice and other dishes.

It is no longer enough to simply get that degree or polytechnic diploma and expect to be able to stay relevant in the job market.

Everyone will need to continuously upgrade their skills and qualifications, even learning new sets of skills to remain competitive and relevant to employers.




TODAY, 13 Jan 2015


Read more about Skills Future Singapore and how the Govt is helping Singaporeans to upgrade, re-skill and prepare for the future below.


Straits Times articles

Vulcan Post

SkillsFuture Singapore 
  • SkillsFuture Mid-Career Enhanced Subsidy The SkillsFuture Mid-Career Enhanced Subsidy supports and encourages lifelong learning and helps Singaporeans stay responsive to a changing workplace. Recognising that mid-career individuals may face greater challenges in undertaking training, the Government has implemented this programme to encourage mid-career Singaporeans to upskill and reskill.
  • SkillsFuture CreditSkillsFuture Credit aims to encourage individuals to take ownership of their skills development and lifelong learning. All Singaporeans aged 25 and above will receive an opening credit of S$500 from January 2016. Your credit will not expire and the government will provide periodic top-ups, so you may accumulate your credit.




PM Lee hails new partnership with old friend Australia in address to parliament





Channel News Asia, Posted 12 Oct 2016 08:32 Updated 12 Oct 2016 17:40

CANBERRA, Australia: The Comprehensive Strategic Partnership (CSP) agreement finalised in May this year will take the relationship between Singapore and Australia one step forward and will "cement our partnership for many years to come", Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong told the Australian parliament on Wednesday (Oct 12).

Mr Lee is the seventh world leader to address the Australian parliament since 2010, joining the likes of US President Barack Obama, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping in having that honour.

Said Mr Lee: “I am happy that Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull and I have concluded the CSP, an ambitious package that enhances core aspects of our cooperation."

Under the pact, the Singapore Armed Forces (SAF) will have more training space in Australia and jointly develop state-of-the-art facilities with the Australia over 25 years. “This will improve the quality of our training, and help to overcome Singapore’s size constraints. Our two armed forces will have more opportunities to train together and enhance interoperability,” noted Mr Lee.

Apart from defence, three other major pillars of the CSP agreement include trade and economics, innovation and science, and improving people-to-people ties.

In trade liberalisation, Mr Lee said an upgraded version of the 2003 Singapore-Australia Free Trade Agreement (SAFTA) will make it easier for professionals and entrepreneurs to work in each other’s countries.

He also said Singapore and Australia have much scope to cooperate more in R&D, noting that Australia has a "very well-developed institute for scientific research" in the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, and that Singapore has identified key challenges to tackle, including basic urban problems such as water supply and energy conservation.

MILITARY DEPLOYMENTS BUILD CAMARADERIE AMONG TROOPS

Mr Lee highlighted the close cooperation between both counties in the fields of security and humanitarian missions. "Our security agencies work closely and quietly together to fight terrorism – sharing intelligence and information, carrying out counter-terrorism operations, and exchanging notes on religious rehabilitation and de-radicalisation programmes," Mr Lee said.

For instance, the SAF and Australian Defence Force train and operate together, with Singapore troops hosted at Oakey and Shoalwater Bay in Queensland and the RAAF Base Pearce in Western Australia, Mr Lee stated. They are also fighting Islamic State extremists together as part of the counter-ISIS coalition in Iraq and Syria.

Mr Lee said these deployments reflect the shared strategic priorities, and have built camaraderie and a sense of common purpose among the troops.

“I know these not just as abstract principles, but through personal experience,” said Mr Lee as he recounted a 1983 cable car accident in Singapore. Thirteen people were trapped in the cable cars to Sentosa, after an oil rig snagged the cable.

“I was then serving in the SAF and directed the rescue operations. We despatched two helicopters with winchmen to rescue the trapped passengers. One of the pilots was a young Royal Australian Navy officer, Lieutenant Geoff Ledger.

“He was on exchange with the Republic of Singapore Air Force, helping to build up its search and rescue capability. He did not have to participate but he did, piloting one of the helicopters. It was a risky operation, at night under windy conditions, but fortunately the rescue succeeded,” said Mr Lee, acknowledging Mr Ledger as a special guest in the audience.

TWO VERY DIFFERENT COUNTRIES BUT GOOD FRIENDS

In his speech, Mr Lee also said the deep and longstanding friendship was forged between Singapore and Australia due to the “similar strategic interests and perspectives” that both countries possess.

“Our societies are open, inclusive and multicultural. We value our ethnic and religious diversity, and appreciate the different races and cultures in our midst. We accept change as the way forward, and look outwards to the world for inspiration, ideas and opportunities," he said.

Mr Lee also stressed the deep people-to-people links between the two nations. Last year, about 400,000 Singaporeans visited Australia and 1,000,000 Australians visited Singapore, he said.


“Indeed many of us have families living in both countries, including PM Turnbull. I was very glad to learn last year that the Prime Minister had a new granddaughter, Isla, born in Singapore during our Golden Jubilee, our SG50 year,” Mr Lee shared. “In Singapore, we would call her an SG50 baby. But because it was also the 50th anniversary of Singapore-Australia diplomatic relations, she is also an SA50 baby!”

“Our partnership is greater than the sum of its parts,” PM Lee said. “I look forward to Singapore and Australia working together to deepen and strengthen it, and enabling our peoples to prosper in peace and friendship for many years to come.”

- CNA/xk

Article Source: Channel News Asia



Published on Oct 11, 2016
Address to the House of Representatives by His Excellency Lee Hsien Loong, Prime Minister of the Republic of Singapore and opening remarks by the Prime Minister of Australia and the Leader of the Opposition.

Source: About the House: the official channel of the Australian House of Representative YouTube Channel

Wednesday, October 12, 2016

The Rise of Loony Fringe wannabes in Singapore politics




US President Obama in the video may have been addressing the circumstances on how disingenuous person like Donald Trump can become a viable candidate for the US presidential office.

However,  what Obama is talking about can be easily observed in Singapore politics as well.

Instead of putting forward viable, alternative policy solutions/suggestions for the electorate to consider, many MP-wannabes chose instead to use tactics which are very similar to what Donald Trump is using - namely half-truths, out-right lies, implying conspiracies, casting innuendos, stroking populist dissatisfaction and anger to order to win votes.




Is Singapore prepared to see her political debate devolve as what is happening in the US, where persons of doubtful character can stand forward to be elected as part of the Govt?

Are Singaporeans ready to put their trust and faith in persons who consistently twist and lie in the face of factual information?


Some of Singapore's Loony Fringe MP-wannabes and political activists/bloggers


In the UK, we have seen how the Brexit politicians campaign for their cause to leave the EU by using misleading half-truths to woe the electorate.



And when these same 'Leave' politicians are confronted by their own media for their promises and claims made, they simply deny any responsibility for their words. The immediate impact of the Brexit vote was the overnight deterioration of the british economy which continues to this day.

Pic: CBC News


But Singaporeans only need to look around the immediate region to see examples of what can happen to a country in a very short time when the wrong people are elected to positions of power.


Philippines's extra-judicial killings of drug dealers without due process, is controversial to say the least.


Even in our own backyard, we can clearly see how the Worker's Party is just floundering in the Town Council accounting mess. Two election cycles have passed, and yet the Accounts still cannot be verified and cleared up once and for all.




Some will disagree and say that similar issues exist in PAP constituencies, just not highlighted by the local media.

But consider this  - Even IF this was indeed a political ploy (and I am NOT saying it is) to put WP in a bad light, what does it tell you about WP when after more than 5 years now, the accounts still cannot hold up to impartial scrutiny by the independent Auditors?




Surely by now, WP would have caught up with the plot and taken immediate measures to resolve this in as short a period as possible? Is that what WP is doing? Why is it taken so long to resolve these accounting issues?

Singapore does not need an Opposition simply for the sake of opposing the Govt of the day.

What Singapore really needs, whether as part of the ruling party or the Opposition, are persons of integrity with a compassionate heart for serving Singapore to improve the lives of all Singaporeans, and not doubtful characters who are simply furthering their own political agenda and satisfying their selfish desire for power and revenge.



Tuesday, October 11, 2016

Short Thoughts on recent events



The Lion vs The Dragon


China is pressuring / heckling / threatening Singapore for our stand on the South China Sea issues. Apparently they are not happy with us advocating for a world where small and large countries abide by a “rules-based international order” (in reference to The Hague Tribunal's South China Sea Ruling).

So now China is getting real angsty with Singapore, a country whose geographical size and population is easily dwarfed several times over by any one of China’s cities by spreading patently false news about Singapore's actions in NAM and even threatening economic sanctions.

We can reasonably infer three things about Singapore from China's reaction.

(1) Singapore's oversized influence on the world stage

What we say and do as a country carries significant clout/influence on the world stage despite of our tiny size. China is aware of keenly this and wants to mitigate the impact/fallout from our stand on the South China Sea issue.

(2) Singapore will not succumb to external pressures that are prejudice to her interests

Our stance on the issue may have been surprising/unexpected/shocking to China. After all, they are such a huge country with one of the world’s largest economy. 

Their surrogate’s reactions tell us what is in their minds. China, as the BIG country, had fully expected Singapore, the TINY country, to be compliant with China’s wishes/whims. The last thing they expected was for Singapore to have its own strong stand/opinion on the issue.

I think they forget that Singapore has been (and still is) through that sort of pressure (both political and economic) before from her neighbors over various issues. Just think Water Supply and Trans-boundary Haze and how Singapore was harassed over these issues.

And Singapore has never caved in or done anything that would be prejudicial to her interests. Even when the US pressured Singapore over the Michael Fay incident, we did not give in to their demands. (ok, we did give them a bit of face by reducing the number of cane strokes that Fay received. But the sentence was still carried out.)

(3) Singapore's Leaders have Balls of Steel the necessary courage to stand up to bullying tactics

Our leaders have the moral courage to take a principled stand, which is consistent with international law, to protect Singapore’s long term interests. We do not cave in to short term political or economic threats to us.

So yeah, China, you can go suck it.


Thailand Terror Threats
Just today (11 Oct), the Thai Police announced that there was an armed group was plotting car bomb attacks in a province near Bangkok. I hope that nothing of the sort happens and the Thais will be able to handle this threat quickly.

I also fervently pray/hope that nothing similar will ever happen in Singapore. And even if it does, that Singaporeans will stand united and strong as one and not falter in the face of terror threats.
Look at the Govt's preparation for terror attacks vis a vis SG Secure movement, the SAF's Army Deployment Force (ADF) and the SPF's Emergency Response Team.


US Presidential Elections
The US Presidential elections have, in my opinion, devolved into a reality show. What is truly horrifying is that Trump, a serial liar to the nth degree, with his disturbing stance on nuclear weapons use (seriously, Trump actually can ask why nuclear weapons should not be used??), can be taken seriously by US voters as a candidate for the highest office in the States. 

We are already seeing some signs of this sort of populist politicians coming into our own elections (read the 'loony fringe' politician-wannabes like HHH, Roy Ng etc). Lets just hope that our own elections do not go down the path of the US elections.


And in other news
The Govt is looking at:
(1) Measures to mitigate the fall from a Recession, just in case it happens. 
(2) Changing the Elected Presidency to strengthen the two-key protection of our national reserves. 
(3) Refining the CPF scheme, to better meet the changing retirement needs of Singaporeans 
(4) building and strengthening our ties with India, Australia and Norway 
(5) Contributing Temasek Rice seeds – a naturally bred rice stain which is hardy and able to withstand extreme weather conditions such as floods and drought - into the Svalbard Global Seed Vault, the world's largest secure seed storage facility. 
(6) Fighting the Aedes mosquito to prevent the Zika & Dengue viruses from spreading.
(7) Building up our National Taps to harden Singapore's water supply for the future.

  
When you take in the big picture of all the recent events around the world, and the activities of our govt, one really has to appreciate the mind-boggling amount of work that is being done. Singapore has huge challenges  and numerous complex issues facing us right now and in the immediate future. 

It is true that the Govt has the advantage of ministries to help with the work but the Ministers are the ones that have to set the direction and lead their respective Ministries. The Civil Service cannot, and should not be,  the ones  who set policy and direction. That is the purview of the elected govt. 

However, when we look at our largest group of elected Opposition MPs in Parliament, we really have to wonder what the heck is going on with them. 




The Workers Party with the largest group of Opposition MPs in Parliament, 6 elected MPs and 3 NCMPs, is still grappling with resolving AHPETC/AHTC accounting issues after more than 3 years now. 

Maybe that's why LTK wants to have 20 Opposition MPs. Even with 9 MPs, WP is still so ineffective/ 
inefficient that they need at least 20 to function properly.

And yet WP wants to take over the PAP and lead the Govt when they, all 6 MPs and 3 NCMPs, cannot even resolve their self-created accounting issues. 

You can't even handle a Town Council and yet you dare to dream of leading the Govt?


Seriously… WTF lah. 




Monday, October 10, 2016

Singapore and Manila illustrate best and worst responses to a superpower


By Roger Mitton, Thursday, 06 October 2016, The Myanmar Times

The most startling news out of Southeast Asia in recent days, and by far the most important in terms of regional impact, came from Singapore.


But many people missed it because they were distracted by more outlandish comments from President Rodrigo Duterte of the Philippines, who hogged the headlines by saying he wanted to copy Adolf Hitler.

Referring to the way Germany’s wartime leader had exterminated 6 million Jews, Duterte said he’d like to enforce the same policy against his country’s alleged 3 million drug dealers.

Initially, he refused to recant this vile and ignorant statement, but then he gave way and said, “I apologise profoundly and deeply to the Jewish community.” He could hardly do otherwise.

Still, it was a shocking episode, although what was more troubling in the long term was his statement about intending to downgrade ties with the United States and boost those with China and Russia.

A bit of strategic balance would be fine and dandy, but Duterte went way over the top and as a result his own people, as well as those across the region, are likely to regret it.

If the Philippines severs its historic ties with its American treaty ally and jumps into the oily and ever-tightening tentacles of Bejing, then it will not easily free itself again – as Cambodia and Laos have discovered.

Whether Duterte understands this is doubtful.

Yes, he has always harboured anti-American sentiments, but to call US President Barack Obama a “son of a bitch”, to tell the Americans “to go to hell”, and to belittle them in talks with Chinese and Russian leaders is not only stupid but dangerous.

At a regional summit in Laos last month, Duterte told Russia’s Premier Dmitry Medvedev about his problems with the US. “They are giving me a hard time,” he said. “They are disrespecting me. They are shameless.”

This was all because Washington had criticised his policy of using vigilantes to murder alleged drug peddlers on the nation’s streets.

Duterte then told Beijing the same thing and naturally the Chinese agreed and said the Philippines would not get much value out of remaining an American ally.

China’s Vice Foreign Minister Liu Zhenmin publicly applauded Duterte’s change of direction and said that China-Philippine ties were now “at a new turning point”.

If Filipinos are not careful it could be a turn over the cliff, especially as Duterte has also said he may scrap the Enhanced Defence Cooperation Agreement signed last year between Manila and Washington.

How not to deal with a superpower, or, as the wild man of Manila put it himself: “I am about to cross the Rubicon between me and the US.”

It is enough to cause collective hand-wringing across the entire region, but at least all is not lost and one member of ASEAN has just displayed the correct and firm way to deal with another superpower.

Step forward Singapore, which has recently been embroiled in a nasty war of words with Beijing.

However, unlike the cock-eyed nonsense spewing from Manila’s motormouth, the verbal rockets fired back at China from Singapore were entirely justified – and very brave.

The tiff began September 21 when the Global Times, a publication tied to the ruling Chinese Communist Party (CCP), said Singapore had lobbied for a stronger pro-ASEAN line regarding the South China Sea sovereignty disputes.

The newspaper said this had occurred at the Non-Aligned Movement Summit in Venezuela last month when Singapore “insisted on shoving in content endorsing the Philippines’ South China Sea arbitration case”.

It may be recalled that in July, the Philippines won a case against China that it had taken to a United Nations arbitration tribunal in The Hague about its offshore sovereignty rights.

The Global Times said that if Singapore, a non-claimant, continued to interfere in the South China Sea issue, then Sino-Singapore relations would be affected.

Rightly irked, Singapore’s ambassador to China, Stanley Loh, wrote to the newspaper’s editor Hu Xijin saying the article was “replete with fabrications and unfounded allegations”.

Loh continued, “Contrary to the claim fabricated by the Global Times, the Singapore delegation did not raise the South China Sea or the tribunal ruling at the NAM Summit.”

So, using proper language, he effectively said that Beijing’s semi-official mouthpiece had lied.

That could not be allowed to stand and the Global Times editor Hu retorted that Singapore appeared “biased towards the Philippines and Vietnam” and was on the same side as the US and Japan.

Hu wrote, “Singapore should feel ashamed of how it has treated its top trading partner, China. You should encourage your country to reflect on its actions.”

Singapore’s Loh replied by pointing out that the Global Times was not in the meetings and had relied on unnamed second-hand sources, whereas Singapore, as a member of NAM, attended all the summit proceedings.

Singapore’s account could be verified by the public record of the meeting.

Of course, it did not end there, because, as Duterte will soon learn, no matter if it’s a big or small matter, China always demands the last word.

On September 29, a senior Chinese military officer, Major General Jin Yinan, urged Beijing to retaliate and enforce sanctions to make Singapore “pay the price for seriously damaging China’s interests”.

He also claimed that Singapore had cooperated with Washington on the issue and caused conflict between the US and China.

He was wrong. The one who has been doing that, and doing it in a dumb and foolhardy way, is Duterte, whose murderous actions and anti-American rants are sure to backfire.

It is Duterte’s wild, irrational behaviour that is most likely to create serious regional conflict.


Article source: The Myanmar Times